Oh, gosh, T'Challa would throw them out of the palace for smack-talking each other.
Marvel Universe: Infinite Chrises
Discussion of all Marvel Cinematic Universe related movies and TV shows, including, but not limited to, the Avengers, Captain America, Agent Carter, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., Daredevil, Spider-Man, Ant-Man, etc., etc., etc. ad-infinitum.
Discussion of non-MCU Marvel titles like the X-Men or the Fantastic Four is also permitted. Ties to comics may be discussed, but this is not the primary forum for comics discussion (see the Other Media thread).
Spoiler policy: For broadcast TV shows, blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast. For movies and Internet streaming shows, whitefont all plot-related discussion until it's been in wide release two weeks. Posters are encouraged to preface their posts to indicate the subject, particulary if switching subjects.
Sorry, I don't think you get to be the hero when you say "I don't care that someone wasn't responsible for his actions; I'ma kill him anyway." If his parents' deaths excuse him playing judge, jury, and executioner then the same goes for the Maximoffs, Zemo, and everyone else who lost someone to Ultron's plans or bombs that Stark manufactured and sold.
SURPRISE GUNN!!!
OK, it's either Deathlok or a phantasm, but still.
Sorry, I don't think you get to be the hero when you say "I don't care that someone wasn't responsible for his actions; I'ma kill him anyway." If his parents' deaths excuse him playing judge, jury, and executioner then the same goes for the Maximoffs, Zemo, and everyone else who lost someone to Ultron's plans or bombs that Stark manufactured and sold.
I assume that includes T'Challa in CA:CW then, too. Because he was also going after Bucky (erroneously) to get vengeance for his father. And it was pretty clear he wasn't going to extradite Bucky to Wakanda to stand trial.
It's a trope at this point for the Designated Good Guy to have the impulse to kill the person who's responsible (or who the Designated Good Guy THINKS is responsible) for the death of a loved one. But then something or someone stops the Designated Good Guy from going through with it. And yet the Designated Good Guy still remains a hero.
I mean, I think Cap was going to kill Tony in that last fight in CA:CW. But he didn't. Maybe he should be lumped in the not-hero group with Tony and T'Challa. The Avengers would be better off run by Spider-Man anyway.
If his parents' deaths excuse him playing judge, jury, and executioner then the same goes for the Maximoffs, Zemo, and everyone else who lost someone to Ultron's plans or bombs that Stark manufactured and sold.
I suspect Tony would agree with you, though not to the extent of letting himself be killed.
But it's not like his thought processes were exactly clear when he went flailing at Bucky.
The Avengers would be better off run by Spider-Man anyway.
Man, I'm picturing Peter's deer-in-the-headlights look on hearing that, and it's HILARIOUS.
It's a trope at this point for the Designated Good Guy to have the impulse to kill the person who's responsible (or who the Designated Good Guy THINKS is responsible) for the death of a loved one. But then something or someone stops the Designated Good Guy from going through with it. And yet the Designated Good Guy still remains a hero.
The Designated Good Guy remains a hero when he makes a decision to resist the impulse at some point, as T'Challa did (despite the death of a loved one being very recent, not an event 30 years ago). As far as I could tell, the only thing that made Stark stop was the dead weight of his nonfunctional armor.
I am with Matt on this but I am on my iPad and can't tl;dr with the backup here. But, yeah.
Sorry, I don't think you get to be the hero when you say "I don't care that someone wasn't responsible for his actions; I'ma kill him anyway."
Yeah, well, if Steve had seen a video of Rhodey going back in time and holding a pillow over Mrs. Roger's face in the sanitorium until she stopped moving, I question whether his first response would be, "I wonder what external factors brought Tony's BFF to this point? Perhaps I should explore further before reacting."
One of the major plot points was a villain manipulating T'Challa and Tony to break up the Avengers. He was good at it. That doesn't excuse Tony, and T'Challa is easily the hero of the movie because he got past it first and best. But there are limits to how much I'll hate on Tony for reacting to having his buttons pushed so well.
One thing I've questioned throughout is why the heck they're trusting the UN. It's a major plot point that Hydra has infiltrated deep within governmental power structures. Was there some massive de-Hydration at the UN that occurred between movies? 'Cause I wouldn't trust a single governmental or supra-governmental entity to run a group of superheroes without it. And Tony would be stupid to trust them, no matter how tired he is of having the responsibility for their actions.
One of the major plot points was a villain manipulating T'Challa and Tony to break up the Avengers. He was good at it. That doesn't excuse Tony, and T'Challa is easily the hero of the movie because he got past it first and best. But there are limits to how much I'll hate on Tony for reacting to having his buttons pushed so well.
Agreed, 100%.