'Day' is a vestigial mode of time measurement based on solar cycles. It's not applicable. I didn't get you anything.

River ,'Out Of Gas'


Natter 73: Chuck Norris only wishes he could Natter  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


-t - Mar 05, 2015 7:35:04 am PST #21328 of 30000
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Hey, today makes two years at this job (including the time spent temping). Time flies. And I'm not all fed up with it and looking to go somewhere else, yet, so that's nice.


Steph L. - Mar 05, 2015 7:40:22 am PST #21329 of 30000
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

They're not tracking whether it got back in two days, they're tracking whether it posted on schedule. The higher-ups know that 2 days is too tight, they know no one can control what the authors do, and they're mainly concerned with being able to say "it wasn't our fault!".

That's basically how the AMA rolls, too, from what I understand. They track how long an article is out, but as long as it gets posted on schedule, it's all good.

But you can't give authors a week, because then they'll take 10-14 days. If you give them 2 days, you stand a good chance of getting it back within 4. (Plus, the 2 days also works for authors who return their article on time but don't answer half the queries, so we can't do anything with the article until they just do what we asked them to do in the first place, and the process of getting them to just answer the fucking questions about why their percentages are all incorrect ends up putting us back at 4 days.)

It's the publishing equivalent of telling your chronically late husband we need to be at the party at 2:00, when it's really 3:00. Not that I would know anything about consistently lying about the time of an event to my husband. For 9 years.


meara - Mar 05, 2015 7:50:02 am PST #21330 of 30000

Argh. And since I complained about the one project here? The other project has now gone all to hell. I really am so fed up with this shit.


Zenkitty - Mar 05, 2015 8:00:46 am PST #21331 of 30000
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

But you can't give authors a week, because then they'll take 10-14 days. If you give them 2 days, you stand a good chance of getting it back within 4.

Exactly. Most authors do turn it around quickly. Some of them ask for more time, and then I look all helpful and easy to work with when I say "Sure, have two extra days!" (My boss likes it when we get positive feedback from authors. I make sure she knows it when I do!) It's the ones who just don't respond that are the problem childs. I had one guy who was handling all the papers for a Special Conference Issue who just dropped off the face of the earth. He got tired of doing it, so he just...stopped. The issue was delayed two months until finally someone else took over. The next year, he volunteered again, and yep -- he did the same thing again. But, hey, he still got to put it on his CV that he'd been a Guest Editor for two Special Issues of the journal. And that's what really matters, right?


SuziQ - Mar 05, 2015 8:14:34 am PST #21332 of 30000
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

I just talked with my dad, giving him an update on the non-progress on the pre-approval. In our discussion, he came up with another idea for helping the process. He had college funds set-up for both kids. K-Bug's covered her first year of school. His thought was that since CJ is going to a Community College and living at home, maybe I can negotiate "dorm cost" with CJ to have some cash on hand from his fund. CJ doesn't know this is out there (I had assumed, but dad hadn't said anything specifically until today). He is going to check on how much is in the account and the process to transfer control to CJ. No clue how amenable CJ would be to this, but hey - you want to live at home while going to school? You can contribute. I like the concept.


msbelle - Mar 05, 2015 8:43:31 am PST #21333 of 30000
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

both of us - fold and put away clothes from drying racks - halfway done, waiting for rest to dry
me - vacuum front room - carpet and furniture (damn animals)
me - use up as much of the perishable food as I can (lunch will be a big salad and left over chicken, guac for mac?, baked potatoes for dinner?, sautéed greens for me) 2 egg scrambles done and all breakfast sausage cooked
both of us - vacuum respective bedrooms, put away clothes - mac did his
both of us - pack - mac has laid out his clothes for me to check
me - litter boxes
mac - vacuum furniture in backroom
me - DEAL WITH THE PAPER EVERYWHERE
me - upload medical bills to fsa
me - start taxes? (honestly probably not)
me - check all bills to make sure are paid
me - food scraps to compost.

some progess.

showered, dressed, food et. second cup of coffee. On to one of the tasks.


SuziQ - Mar 05, 2015 8:51:36 am PST #21334 of 30000
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

And my fussing killed the thread, sorry.

So...what's for lunch?


Tom Scola - Mar 05, 2015 8:52:40 am PST #21335 of 30000
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

I had a burrito from the Korean BBQ truck.


Zenkitty - Mar 05, 2015 8:53:43 am PST #21336 of 30000
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Thread not dead!

Watching three people push a car with spinning wheels up the slope out front. The road is icy. Four cars have had trouble already.


Steph L. - Mar 05, 2015 8:55:11 am PST #21337 of 30000
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

So...what's for lunch?

Probably eggs (scrambled, maybe) with avocado and swiss.