I don't even understand how that can be.
Andrew ,'Damage'
Natter 72: We Were Unprepared for This
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I just do not even. how?
this illegal activity is protected free speech. human trafficking can be protected free speech? and if that is too far, I would argue that coercion MUST be protected if bribery is.
I'm trying not to wish bad things on the conservative justices, and just stick to wishing for something that causes one of them to need to retire.
A couple deciding to retire would be better.
I don't think it's considered bribery if there's no proof that Company A gave Senator B X amount of dollars to specifically do Z. Generous general donations in exchange for a future consideration is in the grey area, even if they've had conversations about what Corp A wants to see happen.
Sigh, I will have to go look at the decision I guess, but that sounds bad.
on my way to the LL Bean outlet, I found there was an actual Hobby Lobby store, but I wasn't curious enough to stop in to not buy anything.
My mom pointed one out when we were out shopping, where the Tower Records was back in the day. I didn't tell her not to shop there because they are evil, because I don't think she would shop there anyway and, really, kind of an inconvenient location.
I don't understand what's confusing for you guys -- corporations are people and money is speech. I mean, obviously!
I thought this ruling was about individual donors, not corporations. Am I confused?
Oh, I don't know anything about what's going on in the Court, just stating some Truths.
You have to say "my friend" somewhere in there, Jesse. Maybe a couple of times?