Question for Mathematicas. Years ago I seem to remember reading that multi-value logic (n-valued logic where n> 2) is less powerful that 2 valued logic. Professor Google gives me no joy on this. Am I misremembering? Or am I just using the wrong search terms?

Sorry, logic isn't my field. I vaguely recall something sort of related to that from a class I took in grad school, but I can't remember details.

I will not get sucked into bullshit on a friend's FB page that posted an article about the paper that says religious people are less intelligent than atheists.

You're too smart to do that.

Thus disproving the paper.

Yes, my sample of 1 is QUALITY DATA.

ION, fucking hell, writing a resume is hard. But I think I've got it about finished.

It's perfectly acceptable to put "I am a TOTAL BADASS" under Summary of Qualifications, right?

The thing that cracks me up is that I am way more intelligent than the poster AND his wife. Combined.

It was posted with the comment ::pulls pin and throws grenade:: which tells me (being of the intelligent sort) that it was posted to be purely incendiary. And so to that, I say "God Bless his little heart" (being of the religious sort).

Well, I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find that the specific set of atheists - i.e. those who have examined their ideas and beliefs, and who have used their intellects to decide that they believe there is no God - do, in fact, have a higher mean IQ than "religious people" given that it is entirely possible to include every level of belief, from the most casually unexamined to the passionately engaged who use their full intellect and have come to faith with their minds and eyes open. I doubt that most people who don't really believe much of anything because they haven't bothered to examine what they do believe will admit it - many of them will identify with generic social levels of religion, simply because they have not bothered to really think anything. The IQ of "religious" people will also skew lower due to the inclusion of those subsets of "religious" cultures who value anti-intellectualism, and avoid education. I do wonder, though, just how big the difference in mean IQ between atheists and religious people who have spent as much time examining their faith as the atheists spend examining their ideas.

Aims,

and from what I understand the article is a bit of a mis-statement. Not to mention, I give a serious side eye to "intelligence" tests and most intelligent people do the same. There is a lot of measurement error in intelligence tests (e.g. what is it really measuring?)

In my field, working with adults with intellectual disabilities, there are people whose parents raised them in a faith, and therefore they identify as religious. To the extent that they express any interest in it, we support them in attending services and participating in other activities to do with their religion. (You should see us Christians scrambling to try to figure out how to not completely desecrate Jewish dietary customs on certain feast days WHEN we remember them... ) There are plenty of individuals who have no particular faith, or no particular interest in any form of religious activity, but they don't exactly get identified as atheists. I doubt that any "study", even the most carefully designed one, will take that into account.

There is a lot of measurement error in intelligence tests (e.g. what is it really measuring?)

Precisely. Psychological measurement is a bit of a crap shoot, trying to measure intangibles. You can't measure intelligence directly. You can measure behaviors such as answering test questions, and you can assume that intelligent people answer more test questions correctly than less intelligent people do, but since it is not a direct measure, there are so many possibilities for confounding factors putting spanners in the works.