No, no, no, sir. No more chick pit for you. Come on.

Riley ,'Lessons'


Natter 71: Someone is wrong on the Internet  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Dana - Nov 10, 2012 12:35:19 pm PST #336 of 30001
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."

Smoked salmon alfredo might eventually kill me, but my god, it's so good.


Sophia Brooks - Nov 10, 2012 12:37:48 pm PST #337 of 30001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Ok, I am watching Glee from the beginning and... why would you have Debra Monk and Victor Garber and not have them sing!?!?


Consuela - Nov 10, 2012 12:38:22 pm PST #338 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

sarameg, good on you & your mom for seeing that your dad's issues might be medical. And I hope his behavior doesn't blight your vacation too much!

Me, I just handed off the Golden Retriever for a couple of days, so while I won't exactly be able to sleep in tomorrow, I will be handling 55 lbs less of dog, and might even be able to go running tomorrow. (I can't run with two dogs, it's too much to control.)

Owen: "The one from the 60s with Leonard Whiting?"

That is some serious Shakespearian geekery there! Way to go, Owen!

Man, I really don't want to move: I've been running around all day and I have a bunch more to do. Gotta go see my folks, and then come back and feed the dogs, and then go to a year clip party hosted by a friend of a friend.

This group of friends collects movie clips all through the year, and then the host sorts them, burns them to DVD, and has a party. We vote on the weirdest/best/random other category clips, and eat lots of great Mexican food. It's really fun. I just wish I could remember people's names from one year to the next. And that I was enough of a cinemaphile to actually collect some clips...


Jesse - Nov 10, 2012 12:46:18 pm PST #339 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Good luck with your dad, sarameg.

I did!

And thank goodness for that! No, wait, I mean the other thing.


le nubian - Nov 10, 2012 12:52:57 pm PST #340 of 30001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

CIA officers, much less the head of the CIA are not supposed to be using gmail either. Huge groups of hackers are trying to find any way into US computer systems and often find an opening through gmail and other mail services.

That Petraeus opened up the US to hacker threat is probably the biggest reason why he *needed* to resign.


Consuela - Nov 10, 2012 12:56:35 pm PST #341 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

CIA officers, much less the head of the CIA are not supposed to be using gmail either.

Have we learned nothing from the hacking of Sarah Palin's Yahoo mail account?


Dana - Nov 10, 2012 12:58:49 pm PST #342 of 30001
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."

Seriously, people. No dirty texts, no emails. It's like no one knows how to have a secret affair.


le nubian - Nov 10, 2012 1:02:08 pm PST #343 of 30001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

So, on twitter I was having an exchange with some reporters who verified what I knew about some forms of secure communication:

if you create drafts in an email account, delete the draft and the compose another draft, that can be a secure-ish form of communication. It seems that the journalists think this is what Petraeus was doing with his biographer. Problem is this was P4's personal acct, and so other email messages were there, or at least the addys were in his address book, and so Broadwell had access to them and emailed threats to P4's friend.


Consuela - Nov 10, 2012 1:14:37 pm PST #344 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

I don't see how it can be secure unless you assume that Google's servers are secure, though. Even if the message never leaves the server itself.


§ ita § - Nov 10, 2012 1:19:14 pm PST #345 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Well, if you encrypt the content in gmail, and obfuscate the IPs you access it with, you buy yourself a bit of wiggle room--the government will get you, and so will Anonymous, but journos might not.