Kittens are much smaller. Hardest part is unhooking all the claws from your clothes to put them down.
Natter 71: Someone is wrong on the Internet
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I can totally see that.
Is there any particular evolutionary advantage to a man to ensure the woman ejaculates, though, or is he still best off playing a numbers game?
Yes, if the theory proves true. Okay, take this all with a massive grain of salt since this info came along with advice like "if you want to have a boy, douche with baking soda" and such. In other words, more than a whiff of woo-woo. But the theory is that if the woman has an orgasm AFTER the man has come, the vaginal contractions will help direct the sperm into uterus.
What the hell, even if it doesn't work, the trying has it's own, uh, benefits. Unlike most of the TTC advice I was given.
But the theory is that if the woman has an orgasm AFTER the man has come, the vaginal contractions will help direct the sperm into uterus.
I think that's what that Renaissance book said!
Bubba and Charlie? Hiding with the elegant Dita? Why do I envision that dog-cat pairing in overalls and straw hats now?
Oh god.
Lee's house it her haw meets dynasty?
Hee Haw! Teee hee.
In the Renaissance they also thought conception took anywhere from 10 to 12 months. Make of that what you will.
Sounds like someone was trying to explain how she got pregnant when her husband was away.
I watched a PBS video which showed a woman's orgasm after her male partner had ejaculated, and it was pretty obvious to me that a woman having an orgasm would help facilitate sperm moving into the uterus. The video was pretty amazing.