Many of those links say he's green.

Nope.

Humans have been consuming domesticated grains for thousands of years, and many (most?) of us have adapted to that food supply that we didn't evolve with.

Exactly. That's why the appendix is obsolete, for one. It was used primarily to digest raw (or rawer) meat, I think.

But you don't get insulin from food -- your pancreas manufactures it to use glucose properly.

Well, yes, but insulin spikes in response to consuming carbohydrates, so a "sugar hit" is also going to be an "insulin hit". (There's evidence that insulin spikes in response to a sweet taste, even if that taste doesn't come with any calories. Which if true could be real problematic for people trying to control their blood sugar by using artificial non-caloric sweeteners.)

Nope.

Weird. I searched for "Is Spock's skin green" (no quotes) but my link is just "is spock". I tried again--same thing.

Exactly. That's why the appendix is obsolete, for one. It was used primarily to digest raw (or rawer) meat, I think.

I could be wrong, but I thought the appendix was the shrunken remains of the cecum or "second stomach", which is used by herbivores to help digest fibrous cellulose-containing plant matter. Since humans learned to process and cook our plant matter, we don't need it anymore.

I thought the appendix was the shrunken remains of the cecum or "second stomach", which is used by herbivores to help digest fibrous cellulose-containing plant matter.

Oh, maybe! I know we don't need it anymore, but that's about it.

I see what you mean about the insulin, but in someone who's not diabetic, it's a normal process, so I don't think it's a big deal. Even on the Paleo diet, you're going to get carbs/natural sugar from fruit.

from my understanding as human beings we are considerably different from humans who lived in 1900, much less those who lived literally hand to mouth thousands of years ago. Why should we advocate the same approximate diet if our bodies differ so much?

How different we really are, physiologically, from our recent and our distant ancestors, is still a matter of huge debate. There have certainly been some adaptations, like the ability to digest milk and the ability to tolerate grains. Some folks insist that the best, healthiest diet is the diet your own ancestors ate - like, if you're Polynesian, you should be eating coconut and fish, and if you're Asian, you should be eating fish and seaweed and rice, and if you're European you should be eating, I dunno, turnips and borscht.

The purity and almost surreal vibrancy of colors in the new transfer far exceed that of earlier DVD releases.

I just noticed that! I rewatched "The Enterprise Incident" and it was so supertrippy colorful. I had never felt like I was watching a Bava movie watching Star Trek before, but that's what it was like and I really enjoyed it.

like, if you're Polynesian, you should be eating coconut and fish, and if you're Asian, you should be eating fish and seaweed and rice, and if you're European you should be eating, I dunno, turnips and borscht.

My ancestors are primarily Scottish and German, so this logic is really not going to work for me. Can I convert to Thai? Or maybe Mexican? I need to find some ancestors who ate mostly spicy foods with lots of cilantro, is what I'm saying.

I see what you mean about the insulin, but in someone who's not diabetic, it's a normal process, so I don't think it's a big deal. Even on the Paleo diet, you're going to get carbs/natural sugar from fruit.

I agree with you, Amy! It's the natural way the human body deals with sugar, and as long as nothing has gone wrong with that process in a particular human body, it isn't a big deal. However, there are Paleo folks who think we shouldn't be eating much fruit, either, because - oh, god, deep breath - because our H/G ancestors didn't have a steady year-round supply of lots of different fruits and we aren't adapted to handle that much sugar.