A broad mandate this is not

What is a broad mandate, then? Feel free to use small words and hand gestures--democracy is new to me (I think that the NBA All Star games were rigged).

I was tempted to try and go to sleep and wake up in a whole new country. But then there was shrieking and clapping from across the courtyard so I stopped composing tumblr posts to see what they were being such graceful winners about...I'm not sure what news station they're watching, but if I move closer to my door, that question will be answered, without me needing to open anything.

I feel bad for republicans in the building. Well, them and people that want to sleep.

Still hollering--I wonder if that's propositions?

People suggested LA Times and Mother Jones for info and analysis of the propositions, and I didn't end up voting on all of them, because a couple I just plain still didn't get. But I swear that the LA Times rationale on the condom thing was twofold: a) porn companies that aren't legit will ignore it and b) legit companies that want to ignore it will move out of CA and take the money with them. If you do accept that porn actors using condoms is a good thing, doesn't that come close to saying their health is important, but not as important as money for the state? I mean--if they said it wasn't our place to say, that would make more sense. But saying it's a good idea, but ineffective PLUS loss of revenue made it sound like there was no point even trying to stipulate workplace safety.

If the issue was, I dunno, assembly line conditions that put factory workers in jeopardy, wouldn't that seem a bit weird--to imply it was up to the factory workers to keep themselves straight, and to say we shouldn't risk losing factories?

Now that I've typed all that out, I need to go back and read it again, because they can't have meant that. I have to be misreading it.

On a serious note, It's extremely heartening that the attempts by Husted et al were ultimately thwarted. (Assuming he doesn't try to pull some "Psych!" moment tomorrow morning.) That would not have been good for the nation.

Where did the 9 go?

Colorado was called for Obama, and then it seems like HuffPo took it back.

But NBC called Colorado for Obama, so I'm confused.

But NPR has Obama at 303, which is WAY past needing Ohio.

Romney, just NUT UP and concede, you weak-ass motherfucker.

And HuffPo just gave Colorado back to Obama.

yeah HuffPo just pulled back on several projections. House races had much larger number projected just a few minutes ago.

and now they seem back. maybe a blip.

The "if we do this thing that seems like a good idea and might even be necessary we will lose jobs" argument always gets made whenever it remotely can be. Sometimes by more people than others, but always by someone.

Romney's just being an ass.

Someone on Kos suggested he's being petty--he wants to delay Obama's victory speech until 3 AM or something.

What is a broad mandate, then? Feel free to use small words and hand gestures--democracy is new to me (I think that the NBA All Star games were rigged).

Exactly the point of the article. (It's an Economist article quoting a Politico article.) Because seriously!

HuffPost said Obama had 290 electoral votes. Now they say 281. Where did the 9 go?

Colorado results disappeared. It's now back in the Obama column - along with Nebraska. I think they have a few glitches still to work out.

Paul Ryan was re-elected to the House according to NPR.