Thanks, JenP. The more the merrier. I like hitting him up for the same word with multiple sentences, especially when I don't have to make them up :).
Natter 70: Hookers and Blow
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
flea, the way you wrote it is still confusing to me! (The last bit is a reference to the title of another book by Tom Wolfe. But yes, so foofy.)
Flea, are you assuming that there is an implied object for "within"?
But those who have never experienced Wolfe’s hyperkinetic narrative style will behold within ample measure of the man in full.
Part of what's confusing is that it took several reads to realize that "behold within" must mean "behold within this book." Of course, Wolfe writes a lot of inexplicable sentences too.
Part of what's confusing is that it took several reads to realize that "behold within" must mean "behold within this book."
Oh, DUH. That's why I couldn't parse it. I kept tripping over the "of".
I didn't find it confusing but badly overwritten.
Those who don't know his crazy style will experience it here.
Still bordering on meaningless, IMO.
Oh, DUH. That's why I couldn't parse it. I kept tripping over the "of".
Aha! I get it now. Sheesh.
Thanks, y'all.
Timelies all!
We had the annual division picture today, followed by individual lab photos. There are two of us in my lab. A third person joined us.
There are two of us in my lab. A third person joined us.
It was the Doctor! Establishing his presence in this time line!
But those who have never experienced Wolfe’s hyperkinetic narrative style will behold within ample measure of the man in full.
I get it but it sounds like he's about to drop his pants.