agreed. I was just looking at various emergency sites and that is just scary and big and fire.
mmm, protein raspberry smoothie no added sugar. yum. with an iced tea chaser.
do we have dj baby news yet? anything on fb?
It's a real burden being right so often.
Mal ,'Bushwhacked'
Natter 70: Hookers and Blow
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
msbelle - Jun 27, 2012 8:44:15 am PDT #11465 of 30001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
flea - Jun 27, 2012 8:46:55 am PDT #11466 of 30001
information libertarian
Yes, baby was achieved yesterday and is adorablesauce. See FB for photo.
Steph L. - Jun 27, 2012 8:50:47 am PDT #11467 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine
Here's a new TV Tropes article with an allegation that, if true, is both horrifying and darkly hilarious (to me): [link]
The article claims that known pedophiles were banned but then Fast Eddie allegedly told them they could rejoin under new usernames.
No word on if their first incarnations had to commit pseudicide.
Frankenbuddha - Jun 27, 2012 8:55:46 am PDT #11468 of 30001
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
Hippo birdies, JZ!
tommyrot - Jun 27, 2012 8:57:23 am PDT #11469 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
The article claims that known pedophiles were banned but then Fast Eddie allegedly told them they could rejoin under new usernames.
Huh.
eta:
TV tropes has, as an anonymous tipper to The Mary Sue noted, “essentially self-selected to become the kind of community that is probably going to be shut down by the FBI.”
Huh.
§ ita § - Jun 27, 2012 8:59:21 am PDT #11470 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I am so confused by that article. I am not sure what they want to happen and what they're criticising. The rape thing was easier, but they quote someone who wants the google ad algorithm to be able to tell the difference between sex and rape? Google knows enough to look for cats, but how much are we attributing to it now? People can't agree--what bright (or fuzzy) line is the software to be programmed to observe?
Also--is the issue banning pedophiles, or banning pedophilic content? If you're talking about participating in any illegal stuff, then I think that's a way bad thing. But if you're a closet criminal, how much responsibility does a site have to make sure you can't post?
I don't want to make it sound like I'm defending Gus, because everything he does is clearly wrong, but I am confused as to what the precise issue is, and also--is "fetish" a trigger now? Like, the word? How does that work?
msbelle - Jun 27, 2012 9:02:09 am PDT #11471 of 30001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
How does that work?
It all starts with a series of tubes.
Consuela - Jun 27, 2012 9:02:17 am PDT #11472 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
I'm worried about those fires: my brother & his family are now in the canyons west of Boulder.
§ ita § - Jun 27, 2012 9:06:53 am PDT #11473 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It all starts with a series of tubes.
Oh, good god, that's disgusting.
I triggered my sister's honeycomb phobia by sending her a picture of a monochromed flaming Z. It was really weird.
SuziQ - Jun 27, 2012 9:09:35 am PDT #11474 of 30001
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame
my brother & his family are now in the canyons west of Boulder.
Keep an eye on the Flagstaff fire as that is the one closest to Boulder. Not sure how close but I think it is to the north west. I think.
I'm skipping karate today. Too hot and too much yuck in the air.