So, in the end, I did find a big mason jar and put the lemon, simple, and gin into it for the French 75s, and they and my deviled eggs (with capers and lemon, mostly) were well-received, but I'm pretty sure the guy who scotched the eggs before deviling them won. Scotched = wrap in sausage and then fry, fyi.

Crap, trying to type I realize I'm at least half-drunk already, but I have to change clothes, put on makeup, and go to a wedding.

Good times.

So, Storm's not? Counting or not counting the X-Men movies?

And, while I'm trying to work shit out in my head--the idea that studios carefully craft an actor's persona to the degree where they're "in character" during junkets and TV appearances related to other roles...I'm trying to work out how best to express that that doesn't make proper sense for Kristen Stewart.

I mean, she's contractually obligated to be awkward and mildly unpleasant because Bella's an everyman? But RPattz is not prohibited for making fun of his character? I mean, is that happening *that* much in the 21st century? It sounds like a relic of the early Hollywood studios, but these days actors seem more likely to be acting at the behest of their own representation than be so owned by a movie.

And by "so owned" I don't understand why anyone would act less-than-charismatic unless maybe they were going for moody and misunderstood (surely that would be what you'd have RPattz doing, right?) to keep the mystique going.

I mean, look at Jennifer Lawrence. Same general target demographic, and she took gorgeous-as-hell and dorky-as-hell and worked the fucking daylights out of both of them. Neither of which are Katniss--they're just "our star is great, isn't she???" Would Twihards ditch Bella if the actress smiled more? Or the general public not buy it?

Why is that more plausible than "she's just not that polished and not that excited by all this and really most people forget the times she's just fine"? Which...why the fuck not?

who's the second most iconic female superhero comic book character?

I would have said Batgirl.

I would have said Batgirl.

Which would explain why DC rewound and erased the last two.

Mmhmm, still bitter.

So, Storm's not? Counting or not counting the X-Men movies?

Storm was terrible in the movies, so...no. I don't know that any individual X-Men are really mainstream iconic besides Wolverine. You might get Professor X and Magneto because of the movies, though.

But Batgirl is probably the best choice.

My friend J is an entertainment reporter specializing in sic-fi/fantasy and said that, unfortunately, KS is one of the most unpleasant people she has ever met (and she’s interviewed her a few times). It’s really too bad.

Does Xena count? i think she qualifies as a superhero - if Batman does, then she does. Plus if you insist on a super-power even though it is never said explicitly she seems to have time travel.

No, I am referring to the comic genre.

I would put Catwoman at #2 and pretty much anyone that I would quickly recognize in cosplay (including but not limited to Jean Grey (hm, would i recognize her? Maybe not, but I can come up with her name when trying to list female superhero comic characters), Storm, Rogue, Batgirl, Supergirl, Mystique) in contention for #3. I don't know how to differentiate within that group in a meaningful way.

I think Batgirl would be #2. #3 might be a toss-up between Supergirl and the Invisible Woman.