DAMMIT!
Thanks, though.
Mal ,'Heart Of Gold'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
DAMMIT!
Thanks, though.
That's a hell of a scavenger hunt, looking for exotic numbers that don't exist.
It's Misha Collins. The list is CRAZY! [link]
My grandmother's on IV antibiotics and doing better this morning.
Good news, Dana.
Ouch, Kristin. And I say that from personal experience. I hope the drugs are working.
I envy you people who have remained close to your families.
It's a mixed blessing.
Sorry. It's unknown.
So can you take a picture of a question mark?
Good things, Dana.
The Mersenne Prime sounds like alien royalty. Stage a Doctor Who shot?
Dark and weird dreams last night.
Good lord! That is very detailed and unsettling. And cinematic.
It's a mixed blessing.
Ayup.
Erin, if you want to try for those points, there's a distributed computing effort (a la SETI@home) to find the 48th. I went to wikipedia when I got the list.
Mersenne prime: [link]
Also basic social skills question. I have written an article on a serious subject with an occasional flash of smartass. Not Allyson or the original Kristen or Miracleman level of smartass, but a bit here and there. However the publication I'm submitting to seems to confine all their smartass to one columnists, with the rest of their stuff being pretty humor free. Should I:
1) Cut out everything witty, basically following Dr. Johnson's advice?
2) Ask the publication before submission? I can't really think of a tactful way to phrase this question to them.
3) Submit with smartass intact and hope?
And yes I do want to write for this periodical.
I say if it's an occasional flash, keep it. They can edit that out, but there's always a chance they're looking for a new voice.