Wait. People? She eats people? 'To Serve Man.' It's 'To Serve Man' all over again.

Gunn ,'Power Play'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Aims - Jun 20, 2011 6:10:35 am PDT #13312 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

So ... I am in need of (even more) advice from the hivemind. When should I get involved in the little spats between the girls? They are 7, 6, and 4. The spats seem to revolve around who plays what role and how in whatever pretend game that they are playing. I'm trying to keep my distance and let them figure it out themselves. Em needs this skill. Her current ethod of coping is to stomp her feet, scream at them, and start crying. Then she runs away and pouts. I say this will all the love in my heart, but my word she is her mother's daughter.

But every so often, the 7 year old gets really bossy and snotty and I totally want to step in and play momma bear. But I know that won't help Emeline figure out how to operate in a group.


DavidS - Jun 20, 2011 6:15:01 am PDT #13313 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Aims, I generally prefer to let kids sort this stuff out themselves. However, having watched two very talented pre-school teachers this year, I know that you can shape the rules of the play so it's less headache inducing for everybody. There's an emphasis on the word "friends" at the school, and "That's not the way we talk to our friends..." and being fair and everybody having a turn. So it's usually a matter of setting the tone of everybody having a turn at various roles and gently shaping the narrative a bit. Makes everybody happier.


tommyrot - Jun 20, 2011 6:27:33 am PDT #13314 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Deep-fried Kool-Aid: [link]


sj - Jun 20, 2011 6:30:16 am PDT #13315 of 30001
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."

Deep-fried Kool-Aid: [link]

Yuck!


Consuela - Jun 20, 2011 6:31:18 am PDT #13316 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

My brother came over last night with his family, and my 3-yo niece had a scratch on her face. Apparently this is the 3rd time she's been scratched or hurt by the same little girl at her pre-school. The pre-school teachers won't even tell my brother the name of the other girl, but my niece has reported it. The pre-school apparently won't or can't do anything to stop the fighting, so my brother took his daughter out of pre-school.

It's okay at the moment because his in-laws are staying with them for a while and they're providing full-time child-care, but I'm just astonished that the pre-school isn't doing anything about the other girl. Is that normal?

ION, we finally got some summer weather here: it stayed warm after sunset last night for once! And it was warm enough this morning I didn't need a jacket. How pleasant!


Aims - Jun 20, 2011 6:32:52 am PDT #13317 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Wow. [link]

That's pretty ... wow.


sumi - Jun 20, 2011 6:34:05 am PDT #13318 of 30001
Art Crawl!!!

Hey, today is National Vanilla Milkshake Day!


tommyrot - Jun 20, 2011 6:37:01 am PDT #13319 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

That's pretty ... wow.

Yeah, well... that sucks.

The Supreme Court is more conservative than it's been in, what, 50 years?

Or maybe it'd be more accurate to say the Supreme Court is very pro-corporate?


brenda m - Jun 20, 2011 6:40:56 am PDT #13320 of 30001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Both are true.


Consuela - Jun 20, 2011 6:42:15 am PDT #13321 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

That's pretty ... wow.

Aims, it looks like the determination was made on a fairly narrow finding that the procedural requirements were not met. That part of the decision was unanimous. So we can't really blame just Scalia and Alito on that--even Sotomayor and Ginsburg concurred on that element (if not on the other parts of the decision).

I can see why the Supremes would be leery about granting certification to such an enormous and ill-defined class of plaintiffs, even if all their claims were later found to be justified (and I'm sure most of them were).