Come on out, River. The nice man wants to kidnap you.

Simon ,'Objects In Space'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Kathy A - Jun 01, 2011 6:52:27 am PDT #10626 of 30001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

I'll have to head over to the Dress Barn in Palatine, then--thanks, ChiKat! (BTW, we really should get together some weekend soon.)

Did the 8th graders get down to Springfield, or is that not a regular thing anymore like it was when I was a kid? I remember when we went, we took a side trip to the Six Flags in St. Louis as well.


askye - Jun 01, 2011 7:04:17 am PDT #10627 of 30001
Thrive to spite them

I read something on livejournal about asexuality recently. I think I was skimming around through different people's friends lists so I'm not exactly sure where I read it. But it was talking about asexuality and how being asexual doesn't exactly mean the same thing to everyone. Which makes sense - like there are some people who are asexual and don't want romantic relationships at all, but some asexuals do want a romantic relationship.

It also had links to fanfic that dealt with asexuality. A lot of it was SGA based with Sheppard being asexual.


Lee - Jun 01, 2011 7:14:40 am PDT #10628 of 30001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

NillyBaby is too cute for words!

Congrats Jon and FAQWife!

I just got my walking papers from the Radiology doctor. One more doctor/department down! YAY.


Steph L. - Jun 01, 2011 7:15:46 am PDT #10629 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

But it was talking about asexuality and how being asexual doesn't exactly mean the same thing to everyone.

If I can tweak this a little -- asexuality doesn't *look* the same in every asexual person (as you said, some are aromantic, some are heteroromantic/biromantic/homoromantic), but overall, the common characteristic is that, regardless of romantic orientation, asexual people don't experience primary sexual attraction. If a person experiences primary sexual attraction, "asexual" is very likely not the right descriptor for them.

(Granted that people can and will and do choose to identify in all kinds of ways that don't always make sense -- obviously there are going to be people who, for instance, *do* experience primary sexual attraction and yet call themselves asexual -- in order to make some kind of sense of "asexual" as an orientation, then I'm sticking with "for the vast goddamn majority, 'asexual' = 'does not experience primary sexual attraction'.")

Asexuality has nothing to do with sexual activity, and aces can and do have sex, often quite a lot, as ita noted. (That gets into the areas of demisexuality and gray-A, which have both gotten slammed recently in certain areas of LJ as "slut-shaming" and not "true" orientations. Stay classy, LJ.)


§ ita § - Jun 01, 2011 7:15:47 am PDT #10630 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Don't let the radiology door hit ya where the good lord split ya!


Amy - Jun 01, 2011 7:23:14 am PDT #10631 of 30001
Because books.

Excellent news, Perkins.

asexual people don't experience primary sexual attraction

So they might have sex as a biological feels-good function, but they're not attracted to one specific partner or type of partner?


Jesse - Jun 01, 2011 7:25:30 am PDT #10632 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Good news, Perkins!


Consuela - Jun 01, 2011 7:25:53 am PDT #10633 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

Yay Perkins!


Sparky1 - Jun 01, 2011 7:26:21 am PDT #10634 of 30001
Librarian Warlord

Great news, Perkins!


Steph L. - Jun 01, 2011 7:32:30 am PDT #10635 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

asexual people don't experience primary sexual attraction

So they might have sex as a biological feels-good function, but they're not attracted to one specific partner or type of partner?

Damn it, my dad literally just showed up to take me to lunch, so I have to go. I'll answer this anon. (Short answer: yes. Long answer: it's more complicated than that, as most things are. Hi, I'm more asexual than not. Or, if you will, demisexual.)