'Safe'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
ah, smonster. Good for you- I think you are doing the right thing. (did this come-to-Jebus talk come from C?)
Ha! No. But now I'm picturing you two getting soggy and bemoaning my unfortunate choices. No, it was a friend who's never met him.
No response from him as of yet.
P-C, just... uggh. Stay strong.
Cash, that kind of thing happened in rugby, too. Much healing~ma to Assbeata.
Shir, I continue to be absolutely thrilled for you and what you're doing. Good luck with the interview!
I have survived the interview.
I hope I did well.
In any case, I never heard back from her after the initial response.
She may have gotten a similar reaction from her folks. Ugh.
Ai wunderz if dis kitteh used teh Gothic Charm School tootorial: [link]
I just found out I won a book from QI through a Twitter competition.
Because your entry rocked.
~ma for your friend, Raq. Lots of good vibes to her.
Much ~ma from here as well, Raq.
~ma for your friend, Raq.
Masses of ~ma, Raq.
I'm sorry, PC, it seems like the girl may have let something slip. I don't suppose telling your folks that while the goal of finding a wife is admirable, the method they're using is highly problematic would make much of an impact. Respect is a two-way street, and if they won't respect your process, I don't see why you need to show more than basic respect for their process, ie, you don't need follow their script. I'm sorry you're left with a non-engagement option (engagement with the process, not engagement with a girl, though that seems to be a result as well).
How's the vacation planning going?