I think that my favorite picture was the one at/after the civil ceremony where Seska is kissing The Girl's hand.
'Potential'
Spike's Bitches 46: Don't I get a cookie?
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I love the rubber duckies! And the seating chart!
Thanks! We did enormous amounts of work on that seating chart. In a 'let's not phone caterers - let's think of more table settings!' way.
I loved the Piano playing too.
You both look lovely! That dress fit you just wonderfully, and your boobs look awesome! The gathering and shirring are very flattering.
TG is so lovely! It looks like such a lovely wedding and there are too many shots I love to detail.
oh pictures! love!
Gorgeous wedding and radiant brides. I love your pictures!
Gorgeous women, gorgeous dresses, gorgeous pictures! Thanks so much for sharing your day with us, Seska. May your marriage be as beautiful as you and your wedding day.
Seska, you are both stunning and glowing with joy. I'm happy for you guys!
I'm so sorry I missed this thread today. Beautiful wedding picures and three very Buffista grammar discussion.
For the record, when I'm doing legal writing, I almost always refer to the gender of either my client or the person in the particular case I'm referencing.
Okay, that wasn't very clear. But the law is all about taking what happened in one case and making it a rule for the instant case. So, if the person in the original case was a woman, my rule uses "she" and vice versa. As in, "when a person crosses the border without being admitted and inspected, she is considered to have entered without inspection and is therefore removable". Even if my guy is a guy, I still use she if the person in the case is a she.