Your friend is gorgeous!!! The post is @@, but your friend is totally lovely.
Have applied calagel, which my iPhone tried to correct to falafel. Hmm, I wonder if chickpeas would help...
Mal ,'War Stories'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Your friend is gorgeous!!! The post is @@, but your friend is totally lovely.
Have applied calagel, which my iPhone tried to correct to falafel. Hmm, I wonder if chickpeas would help...
Rather than the 9-to-5 drudgery to which they have been "liberated" by modern ideology, countless women would prefer to be homemakers creating delectable baked goods and living lives of ease and contentment, while their husbands would happily be the family's sole breadwinners, gladly working so that their brides could have whatever they want, rejoicing in the knowledge that every day they would come home to find an angel in the house. In such traditional circumstances, children would receive all of the attention that they require, and as a result, sons would grow up to be responsible young men, while daughters would become ladylike and well-mannered. (How different from the broken homes of today, which lead to juvenile delinquency, drug use, crime, and promiscuity.)
As the primary breadwinner and wife of a soon-to-be SAHD, may I say FUCK OFF to this entire paragraph?
Yeah, I'm mostly happy she's getting some press. It's been rough in LA for her for a while.
Connie, I thought at first you were being a bit harsh, but then I followed the link and, ye gods.
I know, I saw the pictures and thought "Rock on with your good-looking self!", then I started to read. I was hoping the comments would go "Um, what?", but sadly no.
She's a cutie!
I'll second that.
Rather than the 9-to-5 drudgery to which they have been "liberated" by modern ideology, countless women would prefer to be homemakers creating delectable baked goods and living lives of ease and contentment, while their husbands would happily be the family's sole breadwinners
Um... those countless women are still perfectly free to find a partner who would facilitate that life. It's not like it's illegal now.
The model is gorgeous. The post is a ridiculous white-wash of a tiny portion of history that was oppressive and offensive to women and minorities.
I can celebrate the voluptuous beauty of Reuben's models without wanting to drag us back to the fun-filled 17th Century plague outbreaks. Or appreciate the buxom, bustled ladies of the Gilded Age without wanting to bring back child labor of the 1880s. @@
It's not like it's illegal now.
BUT SOMEONE MIGHT JUDGE THEM! ON THE *INTERNET*!!!
Um... those countless women are still perfectly free to find a partner who would facilitate that life. It's not like it's illegal now.
Hee. I have. And you don't see me baking no fucking cake.
I was hoping the comments would go "Um, what?", but sadly no.
I admit I stopped reading when the first comment didn't call out the execrable bullshit, but seriously...they're all on that page? I did go as far as checking what the website was about, and it didn't seem to be an -ism apologist forum inherently. How bizarre. t /OMC
I could deal with the idealism that's being presented, if it weren't for the assumption that full-figured women can't be accepted if they're not at home Bakin' for Their Man.