Darn your sinister attraction!

Buffybot ,'Dirty Girls'


Natter 66: Get Your Kicks.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Kathy A - Jun 22, 2010 7:03:39 am PDT #8114 of 30001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Yes, indeed!!

I thought about you last night! When I was channel surfing, I saw a listing for an ep of Anthony Bourdain: No Reservations that he filmed there.


msbelle - Jun 22, 2010 7:03:52 am PDT #8115 of 30001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

I was supposed to have the paperwork to sign on my car yesterday morning. I still do not have it.

ION - We, my boss and I, are going to speak to HR about delaying my departure date. Therfore extending my time as a full employee. I would be working remotely only, but putting in 25 hours a week until a replacement was hired and trained. That might extend my health coverage into August which would be AWESOME!


P.M. Marc - Jun 22, 2010 7:08:06 am PDT #8116 of 30001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Speaking just for myself, Gud, but pretty sure some other buffistas will concur based on past conversations, if I marry a man and never have sex with a woman again I will still consider myself bisexual.

Yup. I'd link to the Pride Day post a friend made last year, but I'd have to remember the URL for that. Suffice it to say, at least when I was still dating, it was a LOT harder to find a woman who'd even date me, let alone want to date me for an extended period of time, let alone want to date me for an extended period of time AND who had the right chemistry with me. (Things I strongly suspect: had I had fandom back in the day, I'd probably be with a woman.)


amych - Jun 22, 2010 7:13:07 am PDT #8117 of 30001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Married a man (5 years! Whoa!). Monogamous. Yep, still bi.


smonster - Jun 22, 2010 7:19:47 am PDT #8118 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

it was a LOT harder to find a woman who'd even date me

Cute butches are thin on the ground in my age group and highly coveted. ::sigh:: My OKC messages from women are mostly married chicks in open relationships or who want to step out, despite my explicit "not interested in poly" disclaimer.


Fred Pete - Jun 22, 2010 7:20:15 am PDT #8119 of 30001
Ann, that's a ferret.

he pronounces it New Orleeenz

No such place. There's an Orleeenz Parish, but no city by that name.

I heard Nawlins and Norlins fairly interchangeably. Is one considered more correct/hipper/proper?

It's been a long time since I was there. But "Nawlins" was hip, "Norlins" (or "New Oar-lunz") was perfectly acceptable and "normal", "New OR-lee-unz" was for the older and more proper crowd.


Daisy Jane - Jun 22, 2010 7:21:26 am PDT #8120 of 30001
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

Norlins

This is probably the closest to how I and my family pronounce it. Except maybe more like N'worlins.


Gudanov - Jun 22, 2010 7:22:51 am PDT #8121 of 30001
Coding and Sleeping

I think my observation was misunderstood. Of the people I know in a long-term monogamous relationship who identify as bi, all are with a man. Not a point, because the sample size too small to mean anything (like saying the cool fall in my town last year meant global warming is a hoax). However, if there are a lot of people like me who, for whatever reason, experience the same thing maybe that's the reason for the idea that there's really not such a thing as bi.


Dana - Jun 22, 2010 7:29:40 am PDT #8122 of 30001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

But "Nawlins" was hip

I find it kind of irritating, unless you're Frank Davis.

t /reference only three people will get, maybe


tommyrot - Jun 22, 2010 7:32:36 am PDT #8123 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Um...

Colbert Bait

Citing Leviticus, Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association claims that the mauling death of a hiker in Yellowstone Park was divine retribution:

The grizzly is a predator, a fierce, savage unstoppable killing machine. ... Because these researchers were intent on studying the grizzly rather than killing him to protect innocent human life, a husband, father and grandfather is dead today. This was an utterly unnecessary death which could have happened only because our culture has jettisoned a biblical view of the relative value of human life compared to animal life. Because this animal was given a nap instead of a bullet, a human being is dead, and a savage animal is alive, on the prowl, and ready to kill again.

Kyle at Right Wing Watch raises a hand:

Have I mentioned that Fischer is still listed as a "confirmed speaker" at the next Family Research Council Values Voter Summit along with Rep. Michele Bachmann, Rep. Mike Pence, and Mike Huckabee? Just want to keep pointing that out.