River: They weren't cows inside. They were waiting to be, but they forgot. Now they see the sky and they remember what they are. Mal: Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

'Safe'


Natter 66: Get Your Kicks.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Zenkitty - Jun 15, 2010 8:28:48 am PDT #6682 of 30001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

What the hell is a Moss drag? A green cocktail dress with a 54 chest?


smonster - Jun 15, 2010 8:29:11 am PDT #6683 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

What the hell is a Moss drag? A green cocktail dress with a 54 chest?

And a baritone speaking voice?


§ ita § - Jun 15, 2010 8:30:48 am PDT #6684 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

What is it this time, ita? Megan Fox?

Megan Fox was only the start of my confusion. Now everyone's patting Eva Mendes on the back for how progressive she is for saying she likes to belong to a man. But I bet if a man said he liked to have a woman belong to him, he'd be vilified. Even if that made him Eva's perfect match.


smonster - Jun 15, 2010 8:35:46 am PDT #6685 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

Everyone? I'm seeing a fair amount of dissent in the comments, or at least questioning her semantics.


Tom Scola - Jun 15, 2010 8:38:55 am PDT #6686 of 30001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

British PM apologizes for Bloody Sunday


§ ita § - Jun 15, 2010 8:41:20 am PDT #6687 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That must have started after I stopped reading. As far as I got, it was all "props to her" with some "maybe I wouldn't have said it *that* way, but still...brave of her to say it." I got bored.

But I've never got Eva Mendes anyway. I think she's a crap actress and not that pretty, so there's not that much I'm going to read about her.


Daisy Jane - Jun 15, 2010 8:50:48 am PDT #6688 of 30001
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

I think she looks lovely, but that quote was...what was that? I (usually) really love being married to Jon, but I don't think I would even off-handedly refer to our relationship as one where "belonging" would enter into it. I just don't see it that way.

Though I guess we do have strange ownership language when it comes to personal relationships. It's all MY wife, and a friend of MINE, and we HAVE a mom.


§ ita § - Jun 15, 2010 8:54:51 am PDT #6689 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Though I guess we do have strange ownership language when it comes to personal relationships. It's all MY wife, and a friend of MINE, and we HAVE a mom.

I don't think that is strange at all. I mean, one wants to distinguish this wife from someone else's wife--wife is a relationship, after all, as is friend and mother.

Woman? Not so much. I might want to be someone's wife or girlfriend, but I can't imagine ever being someone's woman. That's just weird.


Polter-Cow - Jun 15, 2010 8:57:13 am PDT #6690 of 30001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

You're like that White Town song!


Daisy Jane - Jun 15, 2010 9:03:10 am PDT #6691 of 30001
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

I don't think that is strange at all. I mean, one wants to distinguish this wife from someone else's wife--wife is a relationship, after all, as is friend and mother.

It seems like it's describing owning the person is all, not the relationship. Mother conjures an image of a female person.

I'm not really advocating/protesting anything here. Just noting something I find itchy when describing relationships, because yeah, Jon doesn't even jokingly refer to me as his woman.