My otherwise beloved husband cannot spell the word "quiet." I married him even knowing this!
Natter 66: Get Your Kicks.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Also, meara and Plei, I'm so sorry. I have a bit of sad fatigue due to some in-law drama (mine are awesome, just that family is having some inheritance stuff that my backwoods po' ass doesn't understand).
And "woah" isn't even how it SOUNDS.
eta No, it doesn't, either!
Zenkitty is right. They both sound like w-sound followed by long o-sound.
"Woah" reads like a 2-syllable word -- wo-a.
WRONG.
Persay.
Um, ouch.
I can't get worked up over "free reign" either - how does it change the idiomatic meaning of the phrase? Unrestrained monarch vs unrestrained horse.
What the hell does "free reign" even mean?
I assume people think of it as reigning freely, which I can't hate them for. Except, they're wrong.
Unrestrained monarch is more dangerous.
Hey Zen, you have email if you're online.
Cass
I assume it's like when I was young and would clip a lead rope to my horse's halter and drape it over his neck, lie back and let him wander around the desert while I watched the clouds.
Was this horse, by any chance, unnamed?
Well, a horse with a rider is generally under the rider's control at all times, unless and until the rider gives the horse free rein (or the horse bucks the rider off or the rapture occurs, or whatever). But for the most part, the vast majority of the time, the horse is not the one in charge.
A monarch tends to be the one in charge fairly well all of the time. I know, I know, it's more complicated than that, but I think the cliche isn't really derived from the fiddly bits of politics involving monarchies and the issue of Parliament vs. the Windsors.
"Free reign" is a given. (At least, when it comes to cliches.) "Free rein" is not. (Ditto.)