Oh, and I have Yaktrax, sumi - they've worked well for me.
Natter 65: Speed Limit Enforced by Aircraft
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Only working a half-day today as my Bro is in town! Since he lives in Europe, I only ever tend to see him at funerals and other events, which sucks--although we do have quite a lively email correspondence. He was on a business trip to Hawaii and arranged a 24-hour layover here. He has never seen our house or anything, so yay!
Ooh, the puppies have a new bed!
Liese being snowed in has me earwormed by a song called "Snowed In." We had what was supposed to be a snowstorm yesterday, but it was just a prolonged snowfall that didn't accumulate much, nor become much of a snow fall.
What is the reason behind people from Country A sometimes not being able to watch video content from Countries B-Z?
What is the reason behind people from Country A sometimes not being able to watch video content from Countries B-Z?
Broadcast rights.
Parochialism.
Jingoism.
Feudalism.
Man, I'm having a bitch of a headache today.
What is the reason behind people from Country A sometimes not being able to watch video content from Countries B-Z?
countries B-Z are selfish bastards.
but mostly, it's about money. If, for example, you can't watch Torchwood in the US, you might buy the DVDs. Or it will increase the value of ad revenue when it is broadcast in the US .
What is the reason behind people from Country A sometimes not being able to watch video content from Countries B-Z?
Licensing rights. For example, Canadian broadcasters will pay good money to show Grey's Anatomy on their network and want to make sure that Canadians watch it on their network. Also, licensed music/images in a show can restrict access.
Which puppies? The shibas?
Get ready for more campaign ads this year, especially paid for by corporations.
The Supreme Court threw out a 63-year-old law designed to restrain the influence of big business and unions on elections Thursday, ruling that corporations may spend as freely as they like to support or oppose candidates for president and Congress. The decision could drastically alter who gives and gets hundreds of millions of dollars in this year's crucial midterm elections.
By a 5-4 vote, the court overturned two of its own decisions as well as the decades-old law that said companies and labor unions can be prohibited from using money from their general treasuries to produce and run their own campaign ads. The decision threatens similar limits imposed by 24 states.