You all are linktastic. I'm avoiding cute dog links, ugly dog links and scary sparkly links.
In other news: HI!
'Just Rewards (2)'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
You all are linktastic. I'm avoiding cute dog links, ugly dog links and scary sparkly links.
In other news: HI!
I'm not sure what to make of the Kagan nomination.
I am distressed by how close she is in age to me. It's making me feel severely under-accomplished. That's the Lisa take on the matter.
Well, that car guy is hardcore:
"I had this antique dealer offer me $75,000 for one of my cars. I said 'no.' I mean no."
I guess I'm safe from being randomly assaulted by my nightmare.
I think I may have mostly fixed my SQL problem. FINALLY. Dumb mistake, too.
Make an original stamp of your baby's hand and foot
For about $90, you can get a beautiful Japanese stamp of your newborn baby's hands and feet in a wooden box from design project Otete & Anyo (means hand & foot in Japanese baby talk).
My thoughts on the SC nom amount to....I wonder what guy on SNL is going to play her in skits.
t /bad feminist
I'm not sure what to make of the Kagan nomination.
I've already read comments on Facebook about how OF COURSE a POTUS with no experience governing (a state) would nominate someone for the SC who has no experience as a judge.
Yesterday on the way home, some yuk-it-up DJ was talking about how she looks like Kevin James. Love the gender conformity policing.
And I read somewhere yesterday that there are rumors she's a lesbian, which is going to make the confirmation process verrrrrrrry ugly.
Bah.
OF COURSE a POTUS with no experience governing (a state) would nominate someone for the SC who has no experience as a judge.
This is funny:
NOMINEES WITHOUT JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE ARE GREAT, EXCEPT WHEN THEY’RE … DEMOCRATS! Senator John Cornyn (Wingnut-TX) thought it would be “very beneficial” to have a bird-brain non-judge like Harriet Miers on the Supreme Court, because she would have a non-judicial “grounding in reality and common sense” lacking in professional judges. But Elena Kagan is a terrible choice “because she lacks judicial experience.”
which is going to make the confirmation process verrrrrrrry ugly.
I don't think this is going to come up during the confirmation process. I doubt it will actually be ugly at all, relatively speaking. There will be some idiots spouting off, but there's just not much on the record about her.
And I read somewhere yesterday that there are rumors she's a lesbian, which is going to make the confirmation process verrrrrrrry ugly.
The rhetoric has gotten ugly already.
And I read somewhere yesterday that there are rumors she's a lesbian, which is going to make the confirmation process verrrrrrrry ugly.
she's been a strong advocate of gay rights, and she's an unmarried, accomplished woman. Of course she's a lesbian. @@