I sort of get the guilt thing when being hit upon. Usually I feel a twinge of "oh I am so not the person you think you're hitting on" when getting hit on. I don't feel like my insides match my outsides at all.

I find it enjoyable when [almost] anyone hits on me

I ... tend to not notice? Unless it's so obvious that it could be seen from space.

Why?

I'm not sure what the short version is. Possibly it boils down to the fact that I'm such crap social material right now I have no business being hit on. Even my OKCupid foray was fanned up by me thinking I was leaving town. If I can't be a good friend to people I already know and care about, what business do I have with randy boys?

At other stages of my life, I should have felt guilty because I was an unapologetic person-crusher or just opaque. But I didn't.

Still reading Bureau 1. We used to vote on thread titles? Like, with polls and everything? Thank god we came up with the bullshit consensus.

deep fried twinkies:

I feel a twinge of "oh I am so not the person you think you're hitting on"

Oh, and this too. Whatever you see, IS A LIE.

I ... tend to not notice? Unless it's so obvious that it could be seen from space.

This would be why I'm still single. I tend to only notice someone hitting on me when I'm not interested. If I could potentially be interested, my brain tells me there is no way he could be interested in me, so I totally miss flirting.

Thank god we came up with the bullshit consensus.

And the idea that I can feel unapologetic about using whatever thread name I thought looked most popular recently AND TAKE NO SHIT. Such a relief. Keep yer resentments to yourself.

That happens to The 'Vine every time there's an article or award. A bunch of tolltaggers show up, pretty much expecting to gawk at the eclecticness of it all.

The good ones become regulars; the bad ones write a shitty review on yelp. Then it all dies back down and I know everybody in the place again.

Yelp faces lawsuit.

attorney claims that Yelp routinely highlights negative customer reviews unless business owners agree to advertise with the company.

I don't know if this is progress or not.

It's the infamous Utah Illegal Miscarriage bill, new news on the local news sites

A bill that captured national headlines for potentially putting mothers who miscarry at risk of being investigated for criminal homicide will be replaced.

Rep. Carl Wimmer, R-Herriman, said Thursday he plans to introduce new legislation to refine his bill, which was drafted in response to a case in Vernal where a teen paid a friend to beat her in an attempt to force a miscarriage.

Wimmer said his bill still would apply to cases like the eastern Utah one. But he is removing language that could subject a mother who miscarries because of reckless behavior to prosecution for criminal homicide.

For example, some suggested that an avid runner who miscarries could end up in prison for life.

"I don't want the false-rumors information that are going around this bill to detract from an otherwise very, very good piece of legislation," Wimmer said.

Both the House and Senate have passed Wimmer's original bill, and the Herriman lawmaker, who has met several times with Gov. Gary Herbert or his chief of staff to discuss it, said he is confident the governor would have signed it.

But his new legislation, without the reckless-behavior provision, would quickly supplant that bill.

"I don't want the controversy to follow Governor Herbert," Wimmer said, adding that his intent by including reckless behavior was to target mothers who use illegal drugs and cause a miscarriage.

[link]

So Hooray! for the thing being changed, but Boo! for Wimmer (yes, he is a twit) only changing it because it's being mis-represented.

I wish I could put it on Facebook, but I'm blocked for another hour and a half.