Early ,'Objects In Space'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Okay, how amusing is this description?
The foot-long, two-speed Hitachi has a soft, tennis ball sized head which is equally good for squeezing blissfully between your thighs or for running up and down a sore back. The ideal choice for those who want a vibrator with many uses.
He actually REWIRED AN OUTLET at midnight.
My dad did that!
That is TOTALLY what my DH would do, Teppy.
That is totally what *I* would do. My ex would have have decided all those things needed to be done and because of that, he just wouldn't do it.
when you are trying to handle business
It's Business Time!
The ideal choice for those who want a vibrator with many uses.
We have actually used it for sore muscles.
Not *often,* but we have.
It's a hedge trimmer AND a french-fry maker!
It is, indeed, Scary Sextoy Friday!! [link]
It's Business Time!
Joe and I have bastardized that song that Hot Dude What Sings It would be appalled.
Me: It's time for birthday pie!
Joe: It's birthday pie!! I try to take off my pie tin, but my filling gets stuck to the bottom ... so I turn it into a sexy dance....
You probably would have guessed this, but stepping on a clipboard in sock feet is surprisingly painful.
Sometimes I forget that he can make any simple project into a 22-episode DIY Network program. He actually REWIRED AN OUTLET at midnight.
I see you've met my husband.
And my boyfriend. (He re-grouted the shower TWO HOURS before my mother was due to arrive for Thanksgiving weekend, as I was trying to make sure everything was tidy and welcoming. @@)
I would hope a vibrator that plugs into the wall would be the Vibrator to Destroy All Other Vibrators!
And Ginger, thanks for pointing out those budget proportions. I was thinking of just welfare. Which is clearly too small. The other stuff being that big, I don't mind. But I'll have to find a better argument against that argument. We may just have to actually get rid of everything and live through a few decades of a lot of people (including several of us I imagine) living in shanty towns, and old and sick people dying in droves in the streets (including several of us I imagine) before people remember why we needed entitlements in the first place.
That one's effective, but I'd prefer a counter argument that's a little less grim.