( continues...) is wise, and it bears repeating:

Miranda rights are are for humans, not solely for Americans. Speaking as a member of a select group which has been routinely denied rights that at least one other select group takes for granted, I'm a big fan of not taking human rights away from select groups just to make privileged groups feel secure. A person never knows when s/he is going to be summarily included in a select group chosen to have their rights denied them.

As for salad shooters. I'm not much of a salad eater, so, I'll try my .357 on it the next time someone brings a salad over. I hope the cops don't come. Eh, it's Texas, gunfire is no big deal.

I heard kat has a very strict return policy.

That your level of sleep deprivation is mild compared to that employed by interrogators.

I can state with absolute authority that non-parents have NO IDEA how much sleep deprivation newborn babies cause unless they've been in Gitmo. It really is that bad.

I simply approach it politically from the opposite direction - the reason the first few months of parenting can feel like torture is BECAUSE IT IS. If anyone other than a newborn baby kept you awake that long, they'd be violating the Geneva Convention.

Sorry, it seems to have become a pet peeve or something. Here is some youtube videos with the first hand observations from the Peter Tripp thing:

Part 1(9min): [link]

Part 2 (5 min): [link]

I'm sort of on the fiscal conservative side, though I like the idea of single-payer health care (puts everyone in one pool, gets employers out of the health care business and makes it easier to change jobs and start your own business, should reduce the cost of what the government currently subsidizes (again, by pooling everyone)) even though it flows more money through the government. So with that caveat aside, I tend to favor trimming defense spending, looking at phasing in a slimming of education spending at the federal level, combining a small cut in social security with an increase in the cap on social security taxes, cutting some farm subsidies, and again pooling everyone in a single payer system I believe will lower the overall spending on health care (private and government).

Cutting spending is really hard. There's so little that's easy to cut. The monster of health-care costs has to be tamed to really bring spending under control.

Cutting spending is really hard. There's so little that's easy to cut.

...and get re-elected afterwards.

Cutting unnecessary spending would be dead simple if politicians (on both sides) were willing to take the risk of pissing off their lobbyists.

When I was driving back home from my sister's last weekend, I was daydreaming that I had the opportunity to give a speech to congress. I talked for about 30 minutes in my car, but the gist of it was this:

In the long run, the people of this country don't give a flying cooter if it's a Republican or a Democrat that fixes the problems that face us and helps our people and makes our country a better place. In the long run, we just care that it was actually fucking done.

And now I have a picture of flying cooters in my head....

I'ma get that Bella Swan Womb lately to knit one.

You worship your flying thing and I'll worship mine.

If you need a cooter that flies, check [link] Last time I was there they featured a lot of crafty vajayjays.