I apologize if I've painted Republicans with a broad brush. I try to keep things to policy and public figures, but I may have brushed too wide at times. Too many political posts to remember all of them.
Spike ,'Potential'
Spike's Bitches 45: That sure as hell wasn't in the brochure.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I like the grating attachment.
THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID!
..wait...did I do that wrong?
Look Dana!
Oh, thank goodness.
I think like a blender, it's pretty simple.
I still haven't used my blender.
was given Miranda rights, which are rights held by Americans
If you mean that non-USians don't have the right to a Miranda warning when arrested, you are incorrect. This was settled over 100 years ago by the Supreme Court in Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886):
"The fourteenth amendment to the constitution is not confined to the protection of citizens. It says: "Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." These provisions are universal in their application, to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without regard to any differences of race, of color, or of nationality; and the equal protection of the laws is a pledge of the protection of equal laws."
Wait...which do you want? Less politics, or more of *your kind*? Because one I'd abide by and accomodate, but I'm not going to let you dump all over Miranda and the Geneva Conventions and think of it as "Shari being Shari" Sorry. No. Things are either fundamental American principles or they are not. Also, there are a million legal ways to get someone to give up too much before and during Miranda that work without laying a glove on the person...watch Homicide sometime...it requires more than brute force which is why its not as satisfying to our collective "monkey mind", but that's what laws are for. To protect us from bloodlust and so forth.
Yeah, I don't see this situation resolving itself through anything but Salad Shooter talk.
Although I find it pretty interesting that despite the very divergent political views, Shari enjoys being here on the board, in a non-troll fashion. And Shari, you are hardcore! No wishy-washy, middle of the road nonsense here. I can't say I agree with your political views in any way, shape, or form, but it's like having a spy in FOX News! Espionage! Intrigue! That's what she said!
ETA: Also I'm totally going to hell for writing "Chief of Staff" and "that's what she said" in the same sentence...I don't believe I did that!
In some ways, I know how you feel, Shari, as I tend to be a liberal surrounded by conservatives in work life (although I was raised as a liberal to libertarian) , and I have ended up disliking people that I previously liked when they posted political stuff that I disagree with. I am actually in the process of trying to understand conservatism and particularly Republicanism, as I feel that a core tenant of my liberal feeling is tolerance.
But I feel very harsh things toward certain right wing people, and I can't get over it, and I feel that these people are taking advantage of rank and file Republicans and their core values, which seem to me to be fiscal conservatism and weak central government, and doing those very things themselves!
But I also feel that Democrats have whipped people up who want ends to poverty and injustice, and good healthcare for all, and aren't really doing anything to make a big change. So I don't know.
But I am sorry if I have said anything hurtful, as I really value (for myself) not being mean to people. That is sort of my core value.
Also I'm totally going to hell for writing "Chief of Staff" and "that's what she said" in the same sentence...I don't believe I did that!
Frankly, I'm surprised it took you this long!