Well, quite a lot of fuss. If I didn't know better, I'd think we were dangerous.

Mal ,'Bushwhacked'


Natter 64: Yes, we still need you  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


tommyrot - Oct 01, 2009 12:50:55 pm PDT #11801 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

The World Needs More Pooh

That’s the opinion of the Trustees of Pooh Properties, which manages the estates of author A. A. Milne and illustrator E.H. Shepard. They have authorized a new sequel in the Pooh series. Return to the Hundred Acre Wood has generated some controversy among Pooh purists, who argue that the original books were about growing up and moving on, and that if the creators had wanted sequels they would have generated them…

“The whole point is that the boy has to go away from his childhood, from this very idyllic pastoral world of his childhood,” she said. “This is an absolutely perfect ending, and doing anything beyond this is pointless.”

The trustees of the estate believe the sequel will be true to the original…

“The good professor and other great lovers of Pooh will have to form their own conclusions,” Brown said. “And they may say, ‘oh, it’s not quite as good, it’s not quite the same.’ I can’t help that. All I can say is we tried very hard to do something that’s not offensive, shall we say.”

Jennifer Quinn of the AP has more details at the StarTribune. The BBC has a writeup on a new character – Lottie the Otter – created for the sequel. And The Guardian makes note in passing of the possibility that Pooh may have had OCD.


Amy - Oct 01, 2009 12:53:09 pm PDT #11802 of 30001
Because books.

And The Guardian makes note in passing of the possibility that Pooh may have had OCD.

Why, people? WHY?


Daisy Jane - Oct 01, 2009 12:55:33 pm PDT #11803 of 30001
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

I think the context of displaying the photo in a exhibit highlighting sexually explicit photos is disgusting.

See, I read that that's what the detractors said the exhibit was highlighting, but the exhibitors themselves were saying it was more to do with glamor and commercialness (not a word, but not sure which other to use).


Kat - Oct 01, 2009 12:56:22 pm PDT #11804 of 30001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

I just have to say EWAN. Always EWAN.

I'm watching last night's Glee. I love Kristin Chenoweth. So awesome.


-t - Oct 01, 2009 1:10:33 pm PDT #11805 of 30001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

The Brook Shields picture, it's actually a photograph of the original photo, did I read that right? So odd. Aside from everything else.


Steph L. - Oct 01, 2009 1:42:21 pm PDT #11806 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

"Sarah Palin Tops Dan Brown"

Well, that does it. I can never be kinky again.

::shudder::


Amy - Oct 01, 2009 1:49:15 pm PDT #11807 of 30001
Because books.

Well, that does it. I can never be kinky again.

Hey! We depend on you! Asshook or not.


Barb - Oct 01, 2009 1:53:24 pm PDT #11808 of 30001
“Not dead yet!”

Seriously, Tep. We need you.


Steph L. - Oct 01, 2009 2:09:45 pm PDT #11809 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Okay, but no asshooks!


§ ita § - Oct 01, 2009 2:24:59 pm PDT #11810 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

You know what? I seem to have an acquired a job. 6 month contract to hire, but JOB. Me. Working.