Now I'm yearning for the bathtub of my youth. We only had one tiny bathroom and no shower. But I would kill to have that clawfoot tub back. *sigh*
Early ,'Objects In Space'
Natter 64: Yes, we still need you
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
That house must need a lot of work. I think that is really cheap for Tarrytown.
2100 square feet!
If I were doing more than window-shopping I'd be concerned with the phrase "some plumbing has been updated," but since I'm not in a position to move, I'll let it go.
It was the only possible answer to someone's homework assignment to find a word that rhymes with sprinkle. Good times, good times.
Heh. I still don't understand Sophia's post, though.
My current apartment has my best bathtub ever. Not a clawfoot, but a big metal tub - I can now stretch out my legs completely (while sitting upright) in a tub for the first time since I was a child.
I'd be concerned with the phrase "some plumbing has been updated,"
I suppose that's better than 'some plumbing has been "updated",'
I'd be concerned with the phrase "some plumbing has been updated,"
Sounds better than, "hope you have a plumber in the family."
I admit, I'm not a neurotypical student and a lack of clear expectations ahead of time screws me up big time.
Fuck, yeah. Me too. So my reaction is total sympathy for the kid.
My concept of pedagogy is biased by my not being a parent or a teacher. I know this. But I also agree with the non-violent part of SH's post. Is humiliating a kid to make a point to the entire class about something as bullshit as text-speak really worth it?
Sorry, I'm not allowed to look at that kind of House porn at work!
And here I thought the Brit's would be more open about that kind of thing. Crazy Brits.
Is humiliating a kid to make a point to the entire class about something as bullshit as text-speak really worth it?
Speaking personally, as a future teacher and not my sister, if it's something that distracts the kid from learning what they are supposed to be learning, then I say, sometimes. It should be used sparingly and only in situations where the teacher really knows her kids and knows how the kid in particular would handle it.
My concept of pedagogy is biased by my not being a parent or a teacher. I know this. But I also agree with the non-violent part of SH's post. Is humiliating a kid to make a point to the entire class about something as bullshit as text-speak really worth it?
I might consider the failing unfair but if it were my kid, I'd also consider it a lesson learned the hard way.
I was getting some good insight from the intense discussion. Enough to be pretty upset with an insult and a flounce-off.