There are a bunch of dwarves though.
'Dirty Girls'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
And a few humans and elves.
Speaking of dwarves, I'm (finally!) watching the blu-ray of Snow White. The Evil Queen is still the best thing about the movie. Her and the Magic Mirror. The restoration is gorgeous.
Speaking of dwarves, I'm (finally!) watching the blu-ray of Snow White. The Evil Queen is still the best thing about the movie. Her and the Magic Mirror. The restoration is gorgeous.
I really love all the scenes of her in the dungeon mixing up her potion and mocking the skeletons of her former victims.
Tom Hardy played the young Picard clone in "Star Trek: Nemesis". He's been around for a while but lost a couple of years through substance abuse. Definitely one of the more interesting young British actors to appear in the past few years, though.
The Observer Magazine had an article on him a couple of weeks ago, though it wasn't particularly revelatory:
I guess... for a movie about dreams, it seemed a bit literal?
I totally agree with you Strega. The whole plotting was wonderfully done, but I kept thinking, "This is awfully boring for a dream." If I could control dreams and build dream worlds, it would be a nonstop Dada amusement park. At the very least some one would fly or breathe underwater.
But it had to be boring for the Mark to believe it was real. There was also the issue of the projections turning on the architect. They were pretty explicit about that when Ellen Page was making the crazy-geometry-world.
Yep, what Jon said.
I loved it, and it only occurred to me afterward that pretty much all the "cool" shots were shown in the trailers, and it didn't matter. They were much better in context, and I didn't feel cheated. (Okay, maybe slightly cheated, because why wouldn't I want more awesome?)
I feel like Christopher Nolan is the live-action Pixar. The guy hasn't made a bad movie. I pretty much love them all. (Huh, I'm surprised that his lowest RT rating is for The Prestige (75%) rather than Insomnia (92%). I thought that was the one that wasn't very well received, since it had to follow Memento. )
I liked how solid and gritty the dreams were. Nolan resisted the impulse to go as crazy as the Matrix or The Cell, but instead gave the dreams lots of texture. The texture gave the effects much more weight. It's interesting when Paris folds in on itself; it's even better that it *looks like* Paris is folding in on itself.
Yeah, but pretty well every dream--except for the opening one, had very literal setting, literal turns of events.
The only fantastical elements of the dreams seemed to come at the hands of the architects or extractors. Everyone else was dreaming business or fancy parties and there was not one midget wrestler, nor potato that transcended time and space, nor dreams where one person was in B&W and the rest of the dream was in colour. The magic and mystery of dreams is that fucked up things can happen and your just accept that as reality. I just think there was an opportunity for some absurdity, and I was a little disappointed there wasn't any.
Also, Leo has to cut out the tanning or tanner, whatever that was. He looked positively orange.