Never saw it. As much as I loved (I just surprised myself with the past tense on that) Woody's earlier movies, I'm afraid I've sorta lost interest in him as he's gotten grumpier. I guess I figure that Bergman's later films are hard on me, even though I love his earlier work, and Allen's later films sound like Late Bergman Lite.
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Laga,
I did not like Match Point. I am not a Woody Allen fan, and I am reminded of this every time I see a WA movie. I did like Hannah and Her Sisters. I think that might be the only WA I've liked. But I'd have to think about it.
I definitely disagree with Dan Savage as far as using that particularly example. There are other WA works that are far far better.
I used to be a WA fan but when Ewen Bremner showed up and D said, "hey, it's Mullet!" I said, "oh lord and he was pretty high up in the credits. I hope that's not indicative of how much movie we have left." I liked how it came around at the end with the whole net ball thing but I felt there was far too much filler in between that idea being introduced and it paying off.
I enjoyed Match Point but would not call it Great Art. I would call it Surprisingly Good For A Woody Allen Movie Made In The Last 15 Years.
(But because it was impressive mostly due to how un-Woody-Allen-ish it was, I'm not sure how it would hold up if you weren't expecting it to completely suck.)
(But because it was impressive mostly due to how un-Woody-Allen-ish it was, I'm not sure how it would hold up if you weren't expecting it to completely suck.)
I enjoyed it, but then I got a fair amount of mileage out of the Crime and Punishment references.
Surprisingly Good For A Woody Allen Movie Made In The Last 15 Years.
I think this is why it's 78% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes.
I missed the Crime and Punishment references. I mean, I noticed someone reading Dostoevsky and the Dad mentioning a conversation he'd had with the fiance but it didn't register that that was supposed to mean something.
DH watched Role Models last night and I caught the last five minutes--which is really sort of worth is. Paul Rudd is still cute.
I liked Role Models much more than I expected too. It's got Paul Rudd AND is geek-friendly.
I loved Match Point. It had this lovely cold-blooded elegance I don't recall seeing in any other Woody Allen flick.
Went to see The Soloist over the weekend. Hmmm. Robert Downey Jr. and Jamie Foxx both give excellent performances, and movie tries pretty hard not to put a pat answer to the issue in question, but I don't think it quite worked. It's mawkish at parts and gritty at others, and the pacing is all over the place. The supporting performers are terrific though -- I really liked Catherine Keener as Downey Jr.'s ex/boss, and Nelsan Ellis as David, the guy who runs the homeless shelter. (I couldn't figure out for the longest time as to where I'd seen Ellis before, then on the drive home, I realized he played Lafayette from True Blood! Almost didn't recognize him without all the swanning.)
I enjoyed Match Point but would not call it Great Art. I would call it Surprisingly Good For A Woody Allen Movie Made In The Last 15 Years.
That's my take on it.