#3 is Prisoner of Azkaban! Did you read the books?
It's one of my favorites, in style and tone. The movie as well as the book, I mean.
We use the latest in scientific technology and state-of-the-art weaponry and you, if I understand correctly, poke them with a sharp stick.
Dr. Walsh ,'Potential'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Amy - Jun 07, 2010 5:38:39 am PDT #8793 of 30000
Because books.
Aims - Jun 07, 2010 5:41:20 am PDT #8794 of 30000
Shit's all sorts of different now.
I have to look at the movies very differently from the books, otherwise I just spend 3 hours yelling, "WRONG!" at the screen and really? Joe will kill me.
That being said, I'm still pissed off that they have basically taken all of Hermione's awesome things and given them to Ron. Who is, mostly, a doofus.
msbelle - Jun 07, 2010 5:55:21 am PDT #8795 of 30000
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
I have too much of a lag between reading the books and seeing the movies. I rarely notice all the wrong things and I can never keep them straight.
Dana - Jun 07, 2010 6:09:39 am PDT #8796 of 30000
I haven't trusted science since I saw the film "Flubber."
#3 is the Sirius/Remus fest.
Aims - Jun 07, 2010 6:15:58 am PDT #8797 of 30000
Shit's all sorts of different now.
It's festival that should be celebrated daily. It's the one relationship I forget isn't "really" canon.
§ ita § - Jun 07, 2010 6:21:47 am PDT #8798 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
#3 is Prisoner of Azkaban! Did you read the books?
A very long time ago. But what Dana says brings it back. Those FX I do remember.
le nubian - Jun 07, 2010 7:10:52 am PDT #8799 of 30000
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
There was a pretty big lag for me between the books and the movies and I even I remember how badly they fucked up #6.
I can't cite chapter and verse of the changes in #3, but #6 was off-putting. They added a scene that wasn't in the book!
Amy - Jun 07, 2010 7:12:53 am PDT #8800 of 30000
Because books.
I hated Half-Blood Prince so much. The movie, I mean. I was surprised by how much it disappointed me.
DavidS - Jun 07, 2010 7:24:47 am PDT #8801 of 30000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I liked Half Blood Prince (the movie), though I think they should have done more on Snape's backstory. I didn't like how they left out the battle at the end of HBP either, though I could understand the narrative logic of ending on Dumbledore's death.
I find that I love the movie version of Order of the Phoenix much more than the book. Book!Umbridge and WhinyTeen!Harry are poor company in the book, and the book desperately needs pruning. (Though that's even more true of Goblet of Fire.)
In the movie, Imelda Staunton's performance makes Umbridge much more interesting, though no less vile. And Harry in the movie seems more anguished and less pissy. Also, the climactic battle in the movie is better realized and more coherent than the endless running into Mysterious Rooms of the book.
I prefer Luna in the movies; I think Evanna Lynch's performance adds a great deal to the character. Same with Jim Broadbent's Slughorn.
Sue - Jun 07, 2010 7:26:17 am PDT #8802 of 30000
hip deep in pie
I don't really remember much about the movie. For the most part, the Harry Potter movies always disappoint. But I still get excited for every one of them. I have to find my fun where I can.