There were explosions and robots and stuff? I'm still back on RDJ building a particle accelerator by hand in a tank undershirt. All I need.
Oh, and Don Cheadle ain't bad, either.
'Potential'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
There were explosions and robots and stuff? I'm still back on RDJ building a particle accelerator by hand in a tank undershirt. All I need.
Oh, and Don Cheadle ain't bad, either.
some women like explosions and robots and stuff.
It's an entire favored genre: Things Blow Up!
Much more satisfying than "chick flicks". Gah.
Anyone remember on the Chris Rock Show about 10-ish years ago, they had a preview for a fake movie called "Explosions" or somesuch. About a cop who investigates a series of explosions. Then his wife leaves him, telling him he cares more about the explosions than her. But then she tries to start her car and gets killed in an explosion.
Um... it was funny - I'm just forgetting some of the funny bits.
I remember that Danger Theater anthology series back in the 90s where the split-screen intro to all the rotating shows synced up to end with MacGruber-style explosions in each one.
Somewhat spoilery Iron Man II review: [link]
Here's something interesting:
So, let's take another look here at the two things which set the tone for this entire film: The Death of Anton Vanko, in his son's arms--Vanko, Sr. being the man whose work on the Arc Reactor helped Howard Stark become the man he was, but who received none of the credit--directly followed by the Grand Entrance of Tony Stark, at Stark Expo to the tune of AC/DC's "Shoot To Thrill." Do you get it? Vanko, broken and alone? Stark, triumphant and surrounded by admirers, through ill-gotten gains? AC/DC? This is Son of Tesla versus Son of Edison, with the fight for recognition, for legacy, for fulfilling a father's dreams, played out on a grand, violent scale. It is subtle but completely intentional, and we even get the joy of seeing some mad-scientist-on-mad-scientist laboratory action, here, though not nearly enough. More on that later.
Somewhat spoilery Iron Man II review:
I loved the caption on the picture: Tony Stark, biggest EPCOT fan there is. ::snerk::
It was interesting, to me how they unreliable-narrator-spun that whole thing. I forget who it was who said that Vanko Sr. was in it for the money. I believe it was Fury. There's this whole thing in the movie--and I think it's a rich enough text that you can read it different ways, rather than "Here is the moral" about the military-industrial-complex. But my real point, relative to tommyrot's point, is one of motive, which I am mangling my memory of Edison vs. Tesla on, and can't comment.
Look, all I know is that Tesla isn't a vampire anymore.
I just saw Wall-E for the first time this morning. My, what an utterly sweet and charming film!! Even the fat blobs ended up being sweet and charming (loved the couple hooking up, and the woman saying to the man, "John, we're going to have kids!" when the nursery slid into them).
Even the fat blobs ended up being sweet and charmingEven the fat blobs ended up being sweet and charming
And the woman staring out the window at the stars.