The air of "We're going to do Star Trek right!" that I picked up from the marketing really annoyed me. I've always felt that all the alternate universe stuff was put in to prevent the legions of original Trek fans from confiscating and destroying all the prints.
No, I didn't like it. Trek: 90210.
Edit: Because if the original story line was good enough, they could have set up a new bunch of cadets following in the old guard's footsteps, then they could have the young, pretty, hop-in-the-sack kids to play with.
I didn't much like the new approach to Trek, but it seemed to me they were bending over backwards to respect what came before.
I didn't get that from the marketing, Connie. I got "We are going to do it ANEW" but that did not imply that they thought the originals were inferior. There was a lot of reverence for the original series in it for me.
Oh, and I loved it and TOS.
Trek has tried new characters before, a bunch of times. But even with the luxury of series behind them, the movies didn't pull. The only way to use the original golden characters and not mess up continuity was to go something like they did.
This is one of those Tom Bombadill things, isn't it?
What's a Tom Bombadil thing? Surely not an implication he belonged in the film?
Tom bombadil is where I permanently stopped reading.
No, just a difference in people's perceptions of what is and what isn't sacrosanct when turning text into film. Some people's untouchable institutions are other people's streamlining, or fodder for updating. Can't please everybody.
Can't please everybody.
"So you might as well please yourself." Sorry. Refuse to get that earworm without sharing.
So I actually want to see a movie or two. This is unheard of. One is
Up in the Air
because of a bit of trailer monologue I saw that just got me. And
Invictus
just because.
Huh. I might even spring for a ticket (since I doubt I can find my dvd player easily...)