You know, it's nice to see that I am not the only person that confuses what I've seen in canon and what I've read in fanfic.
Harmony: Somebody remembered to pick me up the sweetest unicorn. Guess someone was feeling guilty for standing me up in tenth grade. Brad: What? Had to get her something. She sired me. Peaches: Sire-whipped.
'Beneath You'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Aims - Nov 19, 2009 11:26:30 am PST #5080 of 30000
Shit's all sorts of different now.
sumi - Nov 19, 2009 11:31:54 am PST #5081 of 30000
Art Crawl!!!
I thought he went to establish and take charge of that Vulcan colony. Of course, that may just be my insane take on things.
tommyrot - Nov 19, 2009 11:35:04 am PST #5082 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
He found the site of the colony.
But Spock was going to resign and help establish the colony, so Spock Prime implied that he'd do that for him, allowing Spock to hang with Kirk.
Seska (the Watcher-in-Training) - Nov 19, 2009 11:35:22 am PST #5083 of 30000
"We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh?"
I imagine they didn't get The Tick and Suddenly Susan over there, but the misconception of NC is pretty hilarious
Former: not that I'm aware of, but I miss a lot. Latter: we got Suddenly Susan.
The article's just badly researched. The Guardian can do better.
§ ita § - Nov 19, 2009 11:39:40 am PST #5084 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Spock Prime implied that he'd do that for him, allowing Spock to hang with Kirk.
Ah, smoothing the course of true love.
Dana - Nov 19, 2009 11:41:01 am PST #5085 of 30000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
But Spock was going to resign and help establish the colony, so Spock Prime implied that he'd do that for him, allowing Spock to hang with Kirk.
Okay, thanks. I was fairly sure that had happened.
They should bring in the Guardian of Forever. That would be cool. Or the Hortas.
erikaj - Nov 19, 2009 11:42:43 am PST #5086 of 30000
Always Anti-fascist!
No. Le Nubian, thanks for the vote for swagger(Rule 1, in fighting like Ari Gold, go right for the groin...or at least he does. Boom! Fuck your arguments...how's your penis?) I think, so far, it's worked for me because it's so not who I am that it's like sucker-punching people through the "tubes". Also, if I think like him, I'm not all "Gee, maybe I shouldn't have said *that*" But, seriously, five years is nothing.
tommyrot - Nov 19, 2009 11:43:08 am PST #5087 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
There should be a movie about the alternate reality where all the Red Shirts go when they die....
Typo Boy - Nov 19, 2009 11:43:08 am PST #5088 of 30000
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
The article's just badly researched. The Guardian can do better.
But they often don't. The Guardian's political bias is similar to my own. But they are fucking sloppy about getting facts right. Any time I see them writing about a political or environmental subject I know about I catch sloppy errors.
Seska (the Watcher-in-Training) - Nov 19, 2009 11:47:02 am PST #5089 of 30000
"We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh?"
The Guardian's political bias is similar to my own. But they are fucking sloppy about getting facts right.
They're not known as the Grauniad for no reason. They can't get much right. It's a shame, a) because they're the only paper that speaks for me (in a country with a lot of right-wing rags) and I'd like to be able to trust what they write rather than having to look up every 'fact' they quote, and b) because their better-researched articles prove they *can* do better.