and Jane Austen
Burn the witch! Burn her!
'War Stories'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
and Jane Austen
Burn the witch! Burn her!
Burn the witch! Burn her!
I know, I know. It's like my Steph OS didn't get a full install.
You'd think someone would have released a patch by now.
Not only is there no patch, there's no tech support.
Oh, yeah, Hecubus. Like I'm not enough of a weirdo already without the Elf languages.
I reread TFotR recently and still got quite lost in it. I first read it probably when I was 8, so I can't say that I had any preconceptions of how a story should be structured. I love it's rambling ways, and how the scenery seeps into my brain, and embrace it's non-hurry to get where it's going. I think it's because of these books that my first career was originally going to be a gypsy trekking around the world with my pony and wagon.
One of the few people I knew in college who was a bigger Tolkien fan than I was pointed out that there's a recurring pattern in the trilogy. The characters travel, then they face a monster or some other threat, then they stop to eat.
Also in Book 7, Harry has to deal with finding out the Dumbledore may not have been right or honest and heightening his obedience and trust here makes that dilemma stronger when it comes.
"I didn't step in because I couldn't" is less of an internal battle than "I didn't step in and I could have."
I found that LotR works much better aloud (yay, rah, audiobooks!)
Oh my, yes. I cannot recommend highly enough the Recorded Books unabridged versions read by Rob Inglis. Magical! And much better than the various 'full cast' recordings.
While I agree with your first point Scrappy, I think it dilutes the gravity of the situation by shifting the moral dilemma from Dumbledore...and his existential turmoil as described during the coming train station scene (if that even gets included, which I'm doubting at this point)...to Harry. Which gives it much less punch in my imagination.
In truth, I shouldn't be arguing any of these points. The movies are successful, which means I must be missing something in the continuity that is unique to them because I'm so steeped in the books.
I really am happy with the LOTR books and the movies as completely exclusive entities, but I haven't reached contentment with the separation in the Potterverse.