Non-spoilery Catching Fire review that gets to the meat of the matter.
Except he's so wrong! I go into the movies thinking he's right, but by the end, he's wrong. Both times. And his Twilight argument is highly specious. COME ON.
'War Stories'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Non-spoilery Catching Fire review that gets to the meat of the matter.
Except he's so wrong! I go into the movies thinking he's right, but by the end, he's wrong. Both times. And his Twilight argument is highly specious. COME ON.
I agree with him on the main point! Although his Twilight argument is specious indeed.
300 spec scripts, summarized.
The Twilight argument is specious, to be sure. But I'm wondering why the reviewer was wearing a bullet proof vest?
But I'm wondering why the reviewer was wearing a bullet proof vest?
Because he's wrong!
So, The Wolf of Wall Street is just upscale Boiler Room, right?
But with wolves!
Don't tell me different. I like my dreams.
Wolves, maybe, but no Vin Diesel.
Jesse,
I thought it was Wall Street for 2013.
Was Wall Street about criminals? I forget.