not one of Burton's best but OK
Was Burton even involved (except possibly in an amorphous executive producer role)? I thought that one was Selick's alone.
'The Girl in Question'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
not one of Burton's best but OK
Was Burton even involved (except possibly in an amorphous executive producer role)? I thought that one was Selick's alone.
I was really disappointed by James and the Giant Peach.
Bottle Shock got mostly good reviews. Some people thought the camera work wasn't very professional. We had the standee with this pic on it at work and a little kid walked by and said, "I don't like him!" His mom asked, "Who?" and he said, "Snape." Alan Rickman couldn't look more different this maybe 5-year-old kid still knew who he was.
Was Burton even involved (except possibly in an amorphous executive producer role)? I thought that one was Selick's alone.
You are correct - J&GP was a Selick movie, no Burton involvement at all.
I was never really into Roald Dahl as a kid, and the movie had the same Not My Thing Even Though It Really Seems Like It Ought To Be vibe going. I mean, it was fine, but I didn't love it.
I've always liked end-of-the-world stuff, so 2012 is right up my alley.
On a "serious" note, what's the bet that in the months leading up to December 2012, we'll see a recurrence of the months leading up to January 1, 2000.
Bottle Shock got mostly good reviews.
Eliza's in that too, isn't she?
I would like to see Montreal wiped up by a horde of enormous dachsund puppies.
Shouldn't it more properly be destroyed by a rampaging mob led by Zombie Maurice Richard?
Yeah, ED's a hot bartender. She was good in it...not much of a part but she was funny.
Roger Ebert, the universe slam Michael Bay's Transformers sequel in early reviews
So just how bad is Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen? The reviews are already pouring in, and they're not charitable. (The movie opens in the United States tomorrow but is already screening in the United Kingdom, Japan and elsewhere.)
Perhaps most scathing is the Chicago Sun-Times' Roger Ebert, who writes: "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is a horrible experience of unbearable length, briefly punctuated by three or four amusing moments. One of these involves a dog-like robot humping the leg of the heroine. Such are the meager joys. If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination."
As of Tuesday morning, the movie was scoring 31 percent on the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer—and falling.
Oh, now I know where I recognize Bay's name from, here, and from Vince Chase's ice cream headache face about Aguaman 2. Even with Medellin, homeboy still dodged a bullet.