Dr. Walsh ,'Potential'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I wonder if "Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" has pieces missing from it or if the disconnectedness is part of the whole plot-twist that's going on. Maybe the director had more respect for the audience's ability to keep up.
Caligari's intact. The disconnectedness was intentional. Then again, it did have more than one director. Did you know it played continuously in Paris for decades? The first cult film.
I have a DVD of Caligari that I found in a dollar store. I first saw it in a film class in college, and I find it very intriguing.
I think my favorite silent film is The Passion of Joan of Arc
An incredibly good film, but too intense to see more than once.
"Greed" that is a kick in the head.
One that I'd love to see in its complete form.
Calvin's dad told Calvin this....
MY dad told me this. Reading Calvin & Hobbes strips is, in some ways, a look into my childhood.
Why don't I have a copy of Caligari? How is that possible? glares at DVD collection.
I have a DVD of Caligari that I found in a dollar store. I first saw it in a film class in college, and I find it very intriguing.
It's a very fascinating film, and hugely influential. As your film professor probably pointed out, the sets were designed so there are no right angles. The whole movie is designed to keep you askew.
All the talks about silent movies reminds Frank he must get around to watching that DVD of THE LODGER.
Reading Calvin & Hobbes strips is, in some ways, a look into my childhood.
I somehow have Calvin without even trying to be his parents. Of course, Hobbes is currently a wombat.
I was OK with black and white movies, but they ARE boring for a kid. They are not frenetic and stuff doesn't blow up a lot. What really helped me with watching them was really getting into theater; so many early movies are very theatrical, or consciously NOT.
What I hated as a kid and still do are those 1940s - 50s films where the actors all put their heads close together so they are all in focus, cheat towards the camera, and then talk really fast. My father loved them and swore that's how people acted then.
As your film professor probably pointed out, the sets were designed so there are no right angles. The whole movie is designed to keep you askew.
No shit. It's where my dislike of Art Nouveau as an architectural style was solidified. Rooms need real corners and right angles! Anything else makes me very nervous and gives me a headache.
Jilli, I suspect your appreciation of the movie would transcend mine. I can send you my copy if you don't think you'd be able to find it easily. I just stumbled across it flipping through the DVDs in a bin at the dollar store, and that was a year ago.
All the talks about silent movies reminds Frank he must get around to watching that DVD of THE LODGER.
Yes, you should.
I was OK with black and white movies, but they ARE boring for a kid.
I think it depends on the kid and the movie. A lot of what I would watch now is not going to interest a kid, but Laurel & Hardy, Buster Keaton, etc. probably might.
No shit. It's where my dislike of Art Nouveau as an architectural style was solidified.
I think you mean Art Deco.