Buckle up, kids! Daddy's puttin' the hammer down.

Spike ,'Touched'


Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Matt the Bruins fan - Mar 06, 2009 6:01:38 am PST #237 of 30000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I'll admit that the Cloverfield characters were generally Too Stupid To Live, but since I run into people like that every day it didn't seem that farfetched to me. Well, aside from the giant monster devastating Manhattan.

Also, I bought that Rob and Lily had motivation to go back for Beth based on the trauma they'd just suffered. Now Hud and Marissa were complete idiots for not joining that group the Army was shepherding to safety when they had the chance...


Tom Scola - Mar 06, 2009 6:26:18 am PST #238 of 30000
Mr. Scola’s wardrobe by Botany 500

Well, that's one way to get a bunch of positive (if not exactly literate) blurbs for your film.


Jessica - Mar 06, 2009 6:28:57 am PST #239 of 30000
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

I didn't hate Cloverfield, but I wasn't wowed by it either.

I found my original post-screening thoughts in Movies 6 and most of it is bitching about the NYC details they got wrong.


Amy - Mar 06, 2009 6:35:33 am PST #240 of 30000
Because books.

Jessica, the subway stuff drove me CRAZY. And your points about the found footage premise are exactly right. It was an interesting exercise in some ways, but character-wise I ... was happy everyone died. So.

Tonight we've got Blindness. Anyone see it? Don't spoil me, though!


Laga - Mar 06, 2009 8:59:18 am PST #241 of 30000
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

I only caught about half of Watchmen. The first scene, a few through the middle and the last 45 minutes. I thought what they kept was perfect and what they changed needed to be changed. Right actors, right set deisgners, right costumers. I swear some actors they just sucked right out of the comic book. At one point I realized I was sitting in a theatre watching this movie and I felt a little overwhelmed. Something has happened that, for most of the last 20 years, I was sure would never ever happen. Then I realized what a silly fangirl I was being and got over it.


sumi - Mar 06, 2009 9:41:12 am PST #242 of 30000
Art Crawl!!!

Harry Potter trailer


Volans - Mar 06, 2009 11:31:53 am PST #243 of 30000
move out and draw fire

I'll admit that the Cloverfield characters were generally Too Stupid To Live, but since I run into people like that every day it didn't seem that farfetched to me.

I run into those people every day also, but I like to think they wouldn't survive an event like that. Or at least I'd like to get the joy of seeing them eaten, in return for my $10.

ION, Viggo Mortensen nonwithstanding, Appaloosa is not a good movie.


Kathy A - Mar 06, 2009 11:38:04 am PST #244 of 30000
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Viggo Mortensen nonwithstanding, Appaloosa is not a good movie.

Yeah, it's not a horrible way to get through an afternoon, but completely forgettable afterwards. It's hard finding movies that Dad likes, though, so it was worth going to see it with him. (He's a John Wayne buff and loves old-fashioned Westerns, so he's very forgiving of films with quality issues, as long as they feature horses and terse men with guns.)


Volans - Mar 06, 2009 11:39:49 am PST #245 of 30000
move out and draw fire

Roger Ebert gives Watchmen four stars:

I didn't think the review was spoilery for the movie; not even really for the book (which it appears he hasn't read). His final paragraph:

I’m not sure I understood all the nuances and implications, but I am sure I had a powerful experience. It’s not as entertaining as “The Dark Knight,” but like the “Matrix” films, LOTR and “The Dark Knight,” it’s going to inspire fevered analysis. I don’t want to see it twice for that reason, however, but mostly just to have the experience again.


Connie Neil - Mar 06, 2009 12:02:02 pm PST #246 of 30000
brillig

I'm sorry Ebert has lost his voice, but I'm very glad he still has his mind, his fingers, and the Internet.