Gary Ross Has Not Withdrawn From ‘Hunger Games 2′.
Or not. ALL SHAKY-CAM ALL THE TIME.
(Seriously, I had no issues with it.)
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Gary Ross Has Not Withdrawn From ‘Hunger Games 2′.
Or not. ALL SHAKY-CAM ALL THE TIME.
(Seriously, I had no issues with it.)
The shaky cam did bother me, although I sort of understood what he was going for with it (I think). What also bothered me -- and he's not the only director to do it -- is the quick pans that make the shot blurry until they stop. There was one when they were inside the Games control room, and it made me a little nauseated.
I had two big issues with Hunger Games. One was the shaky cam and quick pans. The other was that it didn't stress the reality TV aspect of the games as much as I would have liked. I would have liked more shots of people watching (and possibly cheering on) the games.
In the book, Katniss was constantly aware of the cameras, but since we can't get into her head in the movies, showing people watching and enjoying the games would have helped show that aspect of the books.
See, there was actually more of the reaction and crowd shots than I expected. That part of it was really made real to me.
I loved it, but I do feel like I need to reread, because either I'm forgetting some of the development of Katniss and Peeta's relationship, or I think they didn't make it quite clear enough for someone who didn't read the book (or, uh, forgot stuff).
For instance, in the book did they never discuss why Peeta aligned with the Careers in the beginning? Either way, I thought it wasn't clear enough that Katniss didn't just turn on a dime and fall for him. In the book, it seemed really clear to me that the longer she knew him, the more she liked him, but she was never "in love" the way he claimed to be, and that she was definitely playing a lot of it for the cameras. Given the tight POV of the book, it was obviously easier to show it there, but here I wasn't sure what viewers were supposed to believe about their relationship at the end of the movie.
I thought there was too much emphasis on the reality TV aspect in the sense they didn't make it clear that most of the districts have to be forced to watch. I did like them filling out the sponsor story a bit since in the book you don't learn about how much Haymitch and Peeta's strategy is developed or learn about why he aligns with the Careers.
And I thought the relationships in the movie were pretty unclear. I am almost finished listening to the audiobook now and Katniss says quite clearly that she does not think of Gale romantically (now, she might be lying to herself of course, but she is quite emphatic and he pretty much disappears after the opening). One thing that struck me listening is that the book is divided into equal thirds, with the two divisions revolving around "Peeta" revelations: the first section ends on his interview and the second begins with her reaction to the "she came with me" bombshell; the second ends with the two tributes announcement and her shouting his name, with the third part beginning with her guessing what strategies Peeta had been using to help her.
Also surprising on re-read? How little violence there is. Almost no deaths are described in any detail. I know Cato's is, but nothing else. The worst part so far has been the description of Peeta's wound.
It really is made obvious to non-readers that Katniss only shows affection for Peeta after it's clear it will help her. A real romance doesn't require a post-it instructing one to kiss the other. Additionally, there are multiple incidents throughout demonstrating that she doesn't really trust him like she presumably trusts Gale.
In terms of violence/death, the tracker jacker attack was really horrific, and the District 11 riot was hard to watch.
I think what threw me, bon, was when she caught him with the berries -- her reaction seemed genuine there. She even burst into tears. I didn't get the impression before that that she was a good enough actor to do that on the spur of the moment.
I thought they played the Gale aspect well -- in the book, it was really clear to me she didn't think of him romantically, and in the movie it was clear (to me) that in her eyes they were simply good friends, but he was pining.
I think the books make that clear, too.
As far as the show aspects go, the movie spent time in the studio, which the book really didn't, so I felt that angle much more.
The other thing that was clear to me from the first book and certainly spelled out in detail in the third book! was that Katniss was fairly ambivalent about having kids period. Romance seemed almost furthest from her mind. From my recollection, she never was one to dream about having a husband and kids. She was focused on survival and taking care of her sister.
The 1st book gave me the distinct impression that her relationship with Peeta was essentially one of "trauma brought us closer together" - so that she didn't kind of hate him anymore and didn't treat him with obvious suspicion, but it wasn't even close to a full blown romance either.