Aren't they something. They're like butterflies, or little pieces of wrapping paper blowing around.

Kaylee ,'Shindig'


Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2012 6:37:29 am PDT #18840 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

You do know they say they filmed three resolutions to the movie, right? I don't think there's anything unconscious there.

However, if you write this movie where so can even vaguely reasonably put three endings on it, that might just mean there's no overwhelming evidence leading up to any of the endings. And that's exactly how I felt at the resolution of this one. Like, oh! We were leading up to this? I forgot!

However, up until then, I found it harmless eye candy fun.


Matt the Bruins fan - Mar 19, 2012 6:45:20 am PDT #18841 of 30000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

You do know they say they filmed three resolutions to the movie, right? I don't think there's anything unconscious there.

I was not aware of that. Was the third ending a happy threesome, or did Reese end up going back to sushi for one while the boys rode off into the sunset together?

Aside: I go out by myself to eat all the time, and if anyone gleefully announced something like "SUSHI FOR ONE!!!" to the room they would lose a customer and gain a bunch of negative reviews at Urbanspoon, Yelp, and any other review website I could find.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2012 9:02:44 am PDT #18842 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Sushi.

My fingers are crossed for the DVD, but it does make for a pretty weak structure to the movie.


megan walker - Mar 20, 2012 5:41:30 am PDT #18843 of 30000
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist

So, I saw The Hunger Games last night.

I'm embargoed from blogging a review until Friday, but the social media embargo lifted today. And Buffistas can sometimes be social, right?

Anyhow, I'm spoiler fonting most of the rest: I liked it, but didn't love it. It's inevitable, but a lot was left out and I thought there were other places they could have trimmed: hunting in the beginning, the training stuff.

That said, I didn't think the actual changes they made were too egregious and often were very good decisions. The first image was an odd choice; I thought the words alone would have been much more powerful.

A couple of things I really liked were the story of the pin (much better here than in the book) and that the tech is much more prevalent (I have a huge problem with the disconnect b/w the first and third books and thought that will help the movies.)

Aside from Peeta and Gale (both of whom seemed awkward to me), the cast and acting were spot on. Jennifer Lawrence was excellent, but I expected her to be. I liked this Prim way more than the book. Rue was adorable. I particularly liked Stanley Tucci and Woody Harrelson, and I didn't think I would. But if they make the rest, I can't wait to see Haymitch in action. And Cinna, there needs to be more Cinna.

I was with a critic who hadn't read the books so it was interesting to compare our reactions. He felt it dragged in places and that they seemed to be playing to the fans by leaving every plot point and superfluous character in. He would have liked more of the actual games. He thought they didn't really deliver on how much they emphasized the sponsors and I have to agree. You see Katniss get a few things, but they cut the bread, stew, and the sleeping medicine. When I told him some key layers to the story that were left out, for example, that the dog-beasts were "muttations" (!), I may have inspired him to read the books.


tiggy - Mar 20, 2012 6:14:51 am PDT #18844 of 30000
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

your spoilerfont is making me want to see it RIGHT NOW!!! i'm so excited.


tommyrot - Mar 20, 2012 6:40:25 am PDT #18845 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

So, I saw The Hunger Games last night.

How were the scones?

Anyway, I can't wait! Gotta find some place showing it this weekend that won't be packed.

Yeah, right.


megan walker - Mar 20, 2012 6:47:14 am PDT #18846 of 30000
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist

The screening was at ILM, so, fittingly, no food or drink was available.


le nubian - Mar 20, 2012 7:17:07 am PDT #18847 of 30000
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

megan,

spoiler font reaction: um, I have to say that I am incredibly disappointed that the mutt-ations (lack of clarity thereof) is not a highlight of the movie and I am grateful you included that in your summary. I would have been PISSED not knowing that ahead of time. I'm psyched for the movie, but my expectations are properly tempered.


Polter-Cow - Mar 20, 2012 7:26:12 am PDT #18848 of 30000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I'm psyched for the movie, but my expectations are properly tempered.

That is a pretty odd thing not to make clear. It's one of the more horrifying aspects of the ending, even though I still wasn't clear on whether we were supposed to believe that they WERE the dead tributes or Katniss just thought so in the moment. That confusion may be why they decided to let it go in the movie, especially if there's no narration.


Jessica - Mar 20, 2012 7:33:28 am PDT #18849 of 30000
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

embargoed from blogging a review until Friday, but the social media embargo lifted today

Interesting. If I had to guess, I'd say they want the fandom building up positive word of mouth before the middling-to-negative reviews roll in.