And hey, check it out: no goofs!

I'm not sure it's fair to hold fictional movies to the same standard of continuity as documentaries. [I'm also not convinced that "no technical glitches" = "perfect" but that's semantics.]

Man on Wire was very slight, but pleasant. It's a good movie primarily because Petit is a great character - the filmmaking is nothing terribly special. (Though I do give them props for excellent use of stock footage. Not as impressive as the use of stock in Milk, but still very nice.)

Well, then - are there personal 100% movies?

Most of the ones I'd say in my head are flawed as shit.

And I definitely was thinking of non-documentaries. I think a 100% documentary would be VERY different than a 100% fiction film. (and if those should have been "an" instead of "a" - pblbstbltblblt!!!)

I'm not sure if I understand what you mean by "100% movie."

Well, getting 100% on Rotten Tomatoes only means that there are no negative reviews on that site.

I'm not sure if I understand what you mean by "100% movie."

Is there an unflawed movie, I think, is what it means at this point. It started with the Tomato meter, but I think we digressed from there.

What does unflawed mean? Because I love "Goodfellas" a lot. Would consider it *practically* perfect, except that owing to content,they run it late at night, and it's close to three hours long. So most of the time, I decide *not* to watch it.

Well, I thought The Apartment was pretty perfect.

Man on Wire was very slight, but pleasant. It's a good movie primarily because Petit is a great character - the filmmaking is nothing terribly special.

I loved it, but for me, it's an amazing story, I'm not sure it's a "good" film.

I'm not sure what you mean by unflawed, either. Perfection seems to be in the eye of the beholder to me.

And for what it's worth, I though Man on Wire was pretty good. The director's strategy of structuring the story like a heist film was sharp.

What, I love heist films. I think I will enjoy that thing.