I think the movie Hunger Games should be able to effectively deal with the plot and events well enough that it should be close enough to the book. It would be a major fuck up otherwise.
Books 2 and 3 need some tinkering I think. I just can't see how the 3rd book (except for some battle scenes) is all that filmable. Hell, the last part of the book is tell tell tell (very little to show). Hopefully they have a deft screenwriter. Maybe that's why they are going to split 2-3 into 3 movies.
I think if it's high profile enough that EW writes about it without particular concerns for spoiling it's reasonable to assume spoilers are out there for the bumping into. Doesn't mean you *will*, but it's not exactly treated like your average Nolan movie or anything.
Okay, Alien: Resurrection is much better than Alien 3. It feels more like an Alien movie, and it's pretty fun.
Ugh. Yuck, yuck, yuck. I have a fondness for Alien 3, and what Fincher managed to salvage from it. And it's got Charles Dance FFS. And I could not stand anything at all about Resurrection. Even on rewatch, I found it painfully bad.
I kind of want to know ahead of time if Bane
My roommate and I are speculating that Nolan's actually going to take it further than that.
My roommate and I are speculating that Nolan's actually going to take it further than that.
Follow it up with a nipple cripple?
He's going to take down his business, his possessions, and his name?
My roommate and I are speculating that Nolan's actually going to take it further than that.
You think he's going to kill Batman?
Or...oh, god. Not...
BATUSI?
Or...oh, god. Not...
BATUSI?
Spiderman 3 is all I'm sayin', yo.