le n, I think what I was expecting was more of a thriller I guess. I agree about the TV movie.

I agree about the science, I was disappointed that they didn't explore why Matt Damon's character was immune, why it was so virulent, why the chef at ground zero didn't die, and what the hell was up with Marion Cotillard's character? I love her as an actress, but her story line was just stupid.

RE: Jude Law's character I think he lied, because if he was really immune, then why bother with the makeshift haz mat suit after he got better? I think he lied for the fame and money - $4 million isn't chump change.

Dawn,

hazmat: you have a point about him wearing the suit afterward. I didn't think about that. I guess I just assumed that there were 3 categories of people: 1) those who get the disease and die; 2) those who get the disease and live; 3) those who don't get the disease at all.

I thought Jude Law was in the 2nd category (note: I don't think we ever saw anyone in the second category), but Damon was clearly in the 3rd category.

le n,

That was one of the things that bugged, I mean they went out of their way to explain the R-naught/R-2 factors, etc. why not the virology of the virus too. If it's a normal virus, then once you have it you should be immune until it mutates.

The DH and I had a long conversation about Jude Law's character on the way home from the movie, he thought the way you did, but then I pointed out the homemade haz mat suit after he got better, we both sorta agreed that he'd lied about being sick. Because he should have been behaving more like Matt Damon's character.

no, you make excellent points. You have me totally convinced. I told Beau and you convinced him too.

you need to go into politics. You have two voters on your side.

Here is a piece on the casting of Cloud Atlas.

Well that's good news. I wonder if Natalie Portman was ever seriously considered, or if she's just in a phase in her career where she's up for every role until she's definitively rejected.

They're making a movie out of Cloud Atlas?

Color me skeptical. That novel is a tour de force, but it is so because it's a novel. I am giving the side-eye to a movie adaptation.

I'm less skeptical than I would be if it weren't being adapted by the Wachowskis. Even if they completely frell it up, it won't be boring.

They bored me with Reloaded and Revolutions, so I'll wait and see.

Reloaded definitely improves upon rewatch. I should know, I've seen it like a dozen times. The fucking car chase alone gets me every single time.

Revolutions is too cerebral (and WAY too much Smith). I don't really care that the Brothers wanted the story to be about the machines (or the software running the machines). That's not who I gave a shit about.