'Serenity'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
IO9 really like Captain America. They did describe it as a war film with superpowers, which gives me teensy pause, since I don't like war films. But I like superpowers, so I'm in.
And the posters there that have seen it are very enthusiastic too. So I'm stoked. I have tickets for 8:30 tonight.
With the first 2 movies, the producers were terrified to leave anything out
They should have cut the Norbert storyline entirely, I have to say. It goes on for chapters in the books, and in the movie it gets all of five minutes, and peters out pretty inconclusively (offstage, even, IIRC).
I really love PoA the film, but I wish Cuaron went a bit more into the backstory of the marauders. That might have interfered with the flow of the story, but I feel like that's an important part of the Potter canon that wasn't very well fleshed out in the movies.
Every single one of them, dead by the end of the series, barely into their 40's.
Lupin.
::sighs romantically and sadly::
barely into their 40's
Not even 40, I don't think. Say James and Lily have Harry at 20, or 22: that makes Remus no more than 39 at DH. So sad.
Which means they cast Snape a leeeeetle too old. I mean, don't get me wrong; I think Alan Rickman was born to play that role. And his makeup makes him look younger than he is (though perhaps not THAT much younger). But it is striking how much older he is -- and appears -- than the character should be.
Which, now that I think about it, applies to Sirius and Lupin. (I don't really remember how Harry's parents look in the movies.)
Again, though, I'm fine with it, because the actors were excellent. It's just interesting.
t edit Ye gods, Rickman is 65. That man is my mother's age.
Which means they cast Snape a leeeeetle too old.
Rather, which is why Thewlis and Oldman are also too old for the roles--they must have given up on the conceit that the Marauders were so young as soon as they cast Rickman. So long as you can claim Snape, Black, and Lupin are the same age (although I think Rickman is actually older), it doesn't matter how old they actually are.
65! Wow, he's older than I thought. Well, the makeup and hair do a good job: I would have put Snape as late 40s.
Rather, which is why Thewlis and Oldman are also too old for the roles--they must have given up on the conceit that the Marauders were so young as soon as they cast Rickman. So long as you can claim Snape, Black, and Lupin are the same age (although I think Rickman is actually older), it doesn't matter how old they actually are.
That, too. I'm not sure what you said is what I meant, but I totally agree with it.
IMDB tells me that Oldman is 53, and Thewlis is only 48. Dang, Alan Rickman, you get on with your AARP self!
I imagine 10 years in Azkaban, dealing with life as a werewolf, feeling responsible for the death of your One True Love, prematurely ages a man.
Another way of looking at it, if we're seeing the series through Harry's eyes: all teachers are ancient!
I'm going to see Captain America tomorrow night with StW (the guy I'm dating, for the non-Bitches).