Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Saw Trek. LOVED IT! Didn't mind the comic aspects (they felt very TOS to me). The casting was sublime. Simon Pegg was a bit OTT, but, to be fair, so was Doohan, though he didn't stand out in such stark relief since you also had Shatner in there trying to eat the scenery at the same time.
Z. Quinto was just fabulous, not that it was a big surprise - I thought that was perfect casting as soon as I heard about it. And I thought Chris Pine got enough of the Shatner essence without going for a full-on impersonation.
The villain was definitely the weakest part, but I'm not sure why. His motivation was certainly strong enough, and Eric Bana did a great job, but something was missing.
Sumi, is the IMAX version widescreen or have they converted it to 4:3?
The villain was definitely the weakest part, but I'm not sure why. His motivation was certainly strong enough, and Eric Bana did a great job, but something was missing.
Well, he was basically just Romulan flobotanum - his ONLY function was to provide someone for the Enterprise to shoot at while Kirk and Spock are getting to know each other. (I do wonder if the character was more fleshed out in earlier drafts, because I really can't imagine justifying an actor as big as Eric Bana for the role as it appears in the theatrical cut.)
Speaking of which, I think I identified Sean' other bit of annoying exposition on rewatch - was it
Nero's "I used to be a nice guy and now I'm a disgruntled time-traveling space miner!" speech?
Here is another question for
Trek
fans: how badly are the episodes butchered in syndication? Am I missing anything terribly important or notable? I get all twitchy thinking about the difference between watching the full episode online and the shorter episode on TV.
I do wonder if the character was more fleshed out in earlier drafts, because I really can't imagine justifying an actor as big as Eric Bana for the role as it appears in the theatrical cut.
As someone who still associates him with the hokey sketch comedy show Full Frontal, I love that he now counts as 'an actor as big as Eric Bana'.
Huh. Just checking out on imdb, he had a part in The Castle. I should watch that again.
Oh, here's another tidbit. Prior to playing a Romulan in
Star Trek,
Eric Bana also played the titular character Romulus in
Romulus, My Father.
Here is another question for Trek fans: how badly are the episodes butchered in syndication? Am I missing anything terribly important or notable? I get all twitchy thinking about the difference between watching the full episode online and the shorter episode on TV.
I think there's, what, two or three minutes missing in each syndicated episode?
I downloaded
The Doomsday Device
(or whatever it's called) from iTunes because I wanted to see the new special effects (the original special effects were horrible in that episode). It was cool, as I'd never seen the stuff they cut for syndication before (I think the extra stuff was when
the Commodore escaped from security and stole the shuttlecraft.)
(Whitefont in case PC hasn't seen this yet.)
Anyway, in regards to your question - I don't know. In theory they cut out the least essential bits.
Um, I saw all the TOS episodes in the early '70s in syndication. When you watch it in syndication now, do they cut out more time?
I'm babbling - I think I need more coffee....
I think there's, what, two or three minutes missing in each syndicated episode?
I think it's more like six or seven. The original episodes are 50 minutes long, and episodes today are generally about 43.
In theory they cut out the least essential bits.
Heh, true. I'm usually a completist, so I'm already neurotic about deliberately not watching the whole series. If I'm only watching some of the episodes, I should at least be watching the
whole
episodes! Right?
Um, I saw all the TOS episodes in the early '70s in syndication.
But then again, that's a good point. I watched "The Enemy Within" yesterday and didn't really notice where they might have cut things (although there was one scene where it looks like Kirk's going to give a whole monologue and he only gets out one line).
Although there was one scene where it looks like Kirk's going to give a whole monologue and he only gets out one line.
This may be a plus rather than a minus.
Heeee. I can see the editor being all, "Shut it down!"
was left kinda horrified at the body count and the lack of any reaction from the characters.
Just listening to the A&D book had this effect on me. Superduper graphic descriptions of
the torture and condition of
the bodies and than a big skiptomylou on to the next idea. Ick.
I agree that the problem with the Trek villain lay in his just being there to justify the building of character relationships. His stuff made sense, but the
projection of the hologram just wasn't enough to make us really care one way or the other about him
.
My friend said immediately on exiting the theatre, "I could see that again!" Perhaps some IMAX research is in order.