What? I'm not allowed to hit people? Wesley: Not people capable of genocide. Angel: Those are exactly the types of people I should be allowed to hit!

'Just Rewards (2)'


Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Strega - Jun 10, 2011 12:43:26 pm PDT #14728 of 30000

It was. Box Office Mojo was pretty snarky about it:

Abrams and company act like people want to see movies that they don't know much about, when it's actually story that drives moviegoing, helping people to make decisions with their hard-earned money. Given how pedestrian Super 8 has turned out in its ads, the mystery angle seems like a ruse to disguise that there's no there there. Note to Abrams: Though people didn't literally see the shark in Jaws until near the end of the movie, they still knew it was a shark before buying tickets.

I might be anticipating some schadenfreude.


Matt the Bruins fan - Jun 10, 2011 12:57:23 pm PDT #14729 of 30000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

It looks kind of like Abrams playing follow-the-leader with M. Night Shayamalan's approach to filmmaking/marketing to me. But I figure the train wreck ought to look pretty impressive on a big screen, and Kyle Chandler can always be counted on for an enjoyable performance.


Dana - Jun 10, 2011 1:05:41 pm PDT #14730 of 30000
I haven't trusted science since I saw the film "Flubber."

I thought the reviews for Super 8 had been very positive.

Also, I would like J. J. Abrams to keep making Star Trek movies.


Strega - Jun 10, 2011 2:10:47 pm PDT #14731 of 30000

They're more positive than negative, but there's a pretty wide range. The positive reviews say it's a fun tribute to Spielberg movies, and the characters are more interesting than the story. The negative reviews say it's a calculated imitation of Spielberg movies, and the characters are more interesting than the story.

I suppose it depends on how much you like Spielberg. And lens flare.


Consuela - Jun 10, 2011 2:29:15 pm PDT #14732 of 30000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

And lens flare.

::whimpers::


Sue - Jun 10, 2011 2:48:18 pm PDT #14733 of 30000
hip deep in pie

I suppose it depends on how much you like Spielberg. And lens flare.

My coworker was excited about seeing it and said to me, "It's supposed to be very much like a Speilberg movie." I was all, "That's supposed to make me want to go?"


Gris - Jun 10, 2011 2:59:43 pm PDT #14734 of 30000
Hey. New board.

Owen Gleiberman loved it, and I agree with him more often than not, so I'm looking forward to it. If Lisa Schwarzbaum had reviewed it I'd be much more wary.

Edit: Damn! Never mind, it was Schwarzbaum. Consider me wary.


Amy - Jun 10, 2011 3:00:18 pm PDT #14735 of 30000
Because books.

Aw. I love a lot of love for Close Encounters and Raiders and Jaws. I think Schindler's List is an excellent movie, too, even if I don't particularly want to see it again.

And I love Jurassic Park with an unholy love.


Polter-Cow - Jun 10, 2011 3:29:16 pm PDT #14736 of 30000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

Yeah, I'm a Spielberg fan. And a J.J. Abrams fan. And a Kyle Chandler fan.


Sophia Brooks - Jun 10, 2011 3:36:33 pm PDT #14737 of 30000
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Jurassic Park is a really good movie, and I don't generally lke Speilberg. And the book is really good, and I don't generally like Michael Crichton. I have watched and read multiple times, and it is weird.