Hey, whose friend was it that made Orgasm, Inc.? Because it's finally coming to Netflix!

That really sucks (about the 3-D lenses) but no matter what they say about the difficulty in changing lenses - are we sure that they aren't trying to force us into 3-D showings?

It's not malice, it's incompetence - so many theatres are hiring non-union projectionists these days it's a wonder any movies get shown properly at all.

The shallow part of my brain is really, really easy to please.

This is the thread calling for more shirtless Thor ... so I guess we all have shallow, easily pleased, parts of our brains.

I've known plenty of competent non-union projectionists but it takes a lot of time and energy to train new people and with the digital projectors any clown can change the film or push the button (in many theatres you can start a digital film without even being in the projection booth) so I suspect it's not a concious decison on the theatre managers' part but a lack of training as digital projectors proliferate rapidly across the country.

The post-credits scene in Thor was directed by Whedon.

Nice!

Hey, whose friend was it that made Orgasm, Inc.? Because it's finally coming to Netflix!

Mine! And that's great news!

PIRATES! Wheeee, Pirates! Yes, I went and saw PotC today. It did what I wanted it to, and I think it was much better than the third. (And remember, I like the third movie. I think it's the weakest of the bunch, but I do like it.)

Now, I go read some of the reviews of it, to see what other people didn't like about it.

Now, I go read some of the reviews of it, to see what other people didn't like about it.

Well, I enjoyed the movie, but here's what I didn't like.

I thought that Jack's motivation was pretty thin. He doesn't really want the Fountain of Youth and his feelings for Penelope Cruz's character are a bit ambiguous. So he's just doing his Sparrow-stagger through the movie without much more than saving his own skin going on.

Also, I thought that it wasn't as funny as it could be. One of the better lines of the movie was given to the Spanish officer who said, "Somebody note that man's bravery." I think they should've coughed up the money for somebody like Joss or Patton Oswalt to punch up the script.

As for the action, I don't like big CGI scenes, and I don't like action scenes which are obviously entirely done by stunt doubles. Shooting the first swordfight practically in the dark, with Penelope's character in man-drag was completely uninvolving. I've been spoiled by Jackie Chan movies. I want to see the actors move and make it work.

The plot was kind of jumbled. I think they benefitted from cutting the movie shorter, but it meant that there were a number of plotty elisions. Like the aforementioned Spanish officer and troops who were little more than a plot device.

Ultimately, Jack was not the most interesting character in the movie and that's a narrative sin. His motives and actions just weren't that engaging. The Mermaid/Priest story was smart to include as that had more heart than anything else in the story. And Penelope's character was much more intriguing and motivated than anybody else. Whereas Barbossa was a plus in the earlier movies, in this one Geoffrey seemed to be phoning it in.