Plus, who doesn't like a challenge!
I wonder why filmmakers feel the need to tackle unfilmable books.
That reminds me of one of my first film classes at NYU, which was "Film and Literature" taught by Alain Robbe-Grillet. The first day he opened Proust and read the first line aloud ("Longtemps je me suis couché de bonne heure...") and basically asked, "How do you film that? You can't. I don't believe in adaptation." Um, okay? It went downhill from there.
I wonder why filmmakers feel the need to tackle unfilmable books.
If they didn't, we wouldn't have Tristram Shandy and that would be a real shame.
I wonder if French cinema's love of the voiceover comes from a desire to capture the beauty of prose. Maybe it's not just exposition. (Is it annoying to discuss these sorts of things with someone who's never had a film class?)
Oh my goodness
Tristram Shandy
is such a great movie. And I find myself thinking parts of
Infinite Jest
would look really amazing on screen.
I didn't think
Crash
was a great movie.
OTOH, we also wouldn't have Adaptation, so it can cut both ways...
I had a film professor declare that there has never been a great film made from a great book. Great films are all made from mediocre books and all adaptations of great books are mediocre (or worse) films.
I had a film professor declare that there has never been a great film made from a great book.
Spoken like someone who has never read The Princess Bride.
[eta: There's another one tickling the back of my mind. Something fairly recent where massive sweeping changes were made but both versions worked exquisitely for their respective media. Not LotR, though that would also qualify. Damn it, this is going to drive me crazy.]
Spoken like someone who has never read The Princess Bride.
In fairness, a very rare instance of a novel written by a great screenwriter, who then wrote the screenplay.