don't want to, or they were casting young
Good point. RAH wrote a ton of Conan stories: if they cast young, they can do another whole series of movies.
'Shindig'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
don't want to, or they were casting young
Good point. RAH wrote a ton of Conan stories: if they cast young, they can do another whole series of movies.
Mike Tyson did something else really funny recently
Spoof on The King's Speech, with the King swapped out with George W, and Tyson as the therapist - I think it was on Jimmy Kimmel's after-Oscar special. It was pretty darn funny.
That's the one, Dawn! Thanks.
Plus either of them act better than Schwarzenegger did.
On the downside neither of them would be able to mutilate the pronunciation of the word "lamentations" as spectacularly. IOW, I totally agree.
Plus either of them act better than Schwarzenegger did.
You know the best part about the Govenator's acting? Being able to tell your kids "it's not a tumor" just like he did in Kindergarten Cop. That plus quoting Scar "life's just not fair" are a couple of the up-sides of parenting.
Question I can't answer:
Does Empire Strikes Back stand well on its own as a movie?
My instinct is to say "Yes," but it's hard to imagine why you would watch it and not the other ones.
ita,
I think a person could view ESB without seeing the first. It has a strong beginning, middle, and end and relationships are established early in the film. I think it is probably better on its on than Return of the Jedi - in which 50% of that movie relies on nostalgia.
But it ends all cliffhangery.
well do you think the first Lord of the Rings movie stands on its own?